Critical systemic risk sources in global lithium-ion battery supply networks: static and dynamic network perspectives

Hu, X., Wang, C., Lim, M. K. , Chen, W.-Q., Teng, L., Wang, P., Wang, H., Zhang, C., Yao, C. and Ghadimi, P. (2023) Critical systemic risk sources in global lithium-ion battery supply networks: static and dynamic network perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 173, 113083. (doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113083)

[img] Text
285987.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

1MB

Abstract

Due to the indispensable role of electric vehicles (EVs) in achieving carbon neutrality, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) for EVs have attracted considerable attention in the context of a widely distributed raw material supply and cross-border LIB production. Most previous studies have focused on only one specific LIB-related commodity supply, ignoring the intricate dependent relationships among mineral resources, intermediate components, and finished products. To fill this gap, this study employs a multilayer network model to construct the global EV-LIB supply network from 1990 to 2020 and explores critical risk sources from static and dynamic network perspectives. From the static perspective, the results based on the MultiRank algorithm reveal the critical position of countries, which are covered by single-layer-based indicators. The EV-LIB industry is shifting from upstream mineral resources to intermediate components and finished products (EV-LIBs and anodes). From the dynamic perspective, the impacts of risk sources and their risk transmission paths are revealed by the proposed dynamic shock propagation models under two realistic scenarios, i.e., supply restrictions on a specific commodity and blocked export channels. Some unremarkable shocks to a specific upstream commodity are revealed to have a substantial influence on downstream processes. Different effects of improving a country's anti-risk capacity on strengthening the robustness of the trade system are shown. The findings provide anti-risk support for policymakers seeking to hedge supply risks, adjust industrial planning, and ensure industrial safety.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72101164, 72071006, 71904182, and 71961147003). Dr. Xiaoqian Hu and Dr. Cuiyou Yao acknowledge financial support from the Capital University of Economics and Business of Beijing Municipal Universities' Basic Scientific Research Funds (XRZ2021067, ZD202105).
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Lim, Professor Ming
Authors: Hu, X., Wang, C., Lim, M. K., Chen, W.-Q., Teng, L., Wang, P., Wang, H., Zhang, C., Yao, C., and Ghadimi, P.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Management
Journal Name:Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1364-0321
ISSN (Online):1879-0690
Published Online:28 November 2022
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
First Published:First published in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 173:113083
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record