The discursive construction of gender and agency in the linguistic landscape of Ireland’s 2018 abortion referendum campaign

Strange, L. (2022) The discursive construction of gender and agency in the linguistic landscape of Ireland’s 2018 abortion referendum campaign. Critical Discourse Studies, (doi: 10.1080/17405904.2022.2150669) (Early Online Publication)

[img] Text
285939.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

7MB

Abstract

In a 2018 referendum, the Irish electorate voted in favour of repealing Ireland's quasi-total legal ban on abortion. The referendum campaign saw important public discussions regarding gender roles in twenty-first century Ireland. While the constitutional ban on abortion was condemned by abortion rights advocates for marginalising women's agency, the legislation which replaced it has not escaped criticism either. Therefore, questions surrounding the conceptualisation of women's agency in the 2018 referendum are still relevant today. Adopting a multimodal critical discourse analysis approach, this paper analyses signage from the weeks before the vote to examine the discursive construction of women's agency in the linguistic landscape of the referendum campaign. I argue that many mainstream campaign organisations – including those arguing for liberalisation of abortion laws – were complicit in the discursive diminishment of women's agency, suggesting that the campaign did not necessarily challenge prevailing ideologies of gender and agency.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This work was supported by Economic and Social Research Council.
Status:Early Online Publication
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Strange, Dr Louis
Authors: Strange, L.
College/School:College of Arts & Humanities > School of Critical Studies > English Language and Linguistics
Journal Name:Critical Discourse Studies
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:1740-5904
ISSN (Online):1740-5912
Published Online:03 December 2022
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 The Author
First Published:First published in Critical Discourse Studies 2022
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record