‘It’s about what I’m able to do’: using the capabilities approach to understand the relationship between quality of life and vascular access in patients with end-stage kidney failure

Greenwood, S. , Kingsmore, D., Richarz, S., Thomson, P., Bouamrane, M., Meiklem, R., Dunlop, M. and Stevenson, K. (2022) ‘It’s about what I’m able to do’: using the capabilities approach to understand the relationship between quality of life and vascular access in patients with end-stage kidney failure. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100187. (doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100187)

[img] Text
284062.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

579kB

Abstract

Prevalence rates of End-Stage Kidney Failure (ESKF) have risen in across the world in recent years, making it one of the most common chronic illnesses. The main treatment for ESKF is haemodialysis, where one is ‘connected’ to a dialysis machine to clean and filter the blood via a surgically-created portal, also known as ‘vascular access’. Without functioning vascular access, dialysis is impossible. People with ESKF have different experiences with their access modalities, but universally describe their access point as a ‘lifeline’. Previous research has emphasised the impact it can have on wellbeing (Kalloo et al., 2016; Casey et al., 2014; Quinn et al., 2008), and specifically on short- and long-term outcomes. Capturing Quality of Life (QoL) within ESKF populations has traditionally focused upon assessing wellbeing from an objective, normative, top-down stance, rather than appreciating the nuanced effect vascular access can have as experienced by those living with kidney failure. In this article, we argue current QoL measures used with ESKF groups are insufficient at capturing the impact of vascular access on wellbeing. Using the accounts of twenty-four haemodialysis patients, we share insights into the direct and indirect influences vascular access has upon QoL, using Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach as an analytical lens. By prioritising and privileging the voices of those directly affected, the Vascular Access Specific Quality of Life (VA Specific-QOL) model provides a starting point for a more representative way to assess wellbeing in this group.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This work was supported by an investigator-led small research grant from W.L. Gore.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Thomson, Dr Peter and Kingsmore, Prof David and Bouamrane, Dr Matt-Mouley and Dunlop, Dr Mark David and Stevenson, Dr Karen and Greenwood, Dr Sharon
Authors: Greenwood, S., Kingsmore, D., Richarz, S., Thomson, P., Bouamrane, M., Meiklem, R., Dunlop, M., and Stevenson, K.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > Public Health
Journal Name:SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:2667-3215
ISSN (Online):2667-3215
Published Online:22 October 2022
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 The Authors
First Published:First published in SSM - Qualitative Research in Health 2: 100187
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record