Risk refraction: Thoughts on the victim-survivor's risk journey through the criminal justice process

Barlow, C., Walklate, S. and Johnson, K. (2021) Risk refraction: Thoughts on the victim-survivor's risk journey through the criminal justice process. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 10(3), pp. 177-190. (doi: 10.5204/ijcjsd.1805)

[img] Text
282879.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

326kB

Abstract

The limits of inter-agency understandings of risk in the context of intimate partner violence are well documented. Informed by Hester’s (2011) ‘three planet’ analogy and using empirical data in one police force area in the south of England, this paper offers an exploration of intra-agency operations, focusing on police risk assessment practices. Exploring the policing risk lens and the victim-survivor journey together, findings highlight police operate with at least three risk assessment moments (call hander, front-line and Safeguarding Hub) and point to the tensions that result when failing to centralise victim-survivors’ own assessment of their risk. Using complexity theory, this paper examines the complex interplay of risk that occurs when the victim-survivor risk journey intersects with the policing aspect of the criminal justice process.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Johnson, Dr Kelly
Authors: Barlow, C., Walklate, S., and Johnson, K.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Sociology Anthropology and Applied Social Sciences
Journal Name:International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
Publisher:International Journal of Crime Justice and Social Democracy
ISSN:2202-7998
ISSN (Online):2202-8005
Copyright Holders:Copyright © The Author(s) 2021
First Published:First published in International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 10(3): 177-190
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record