Restitution under an illegal contract: a Scots law perspective on Patel v. Mirza

Ezike, O. and MacLeod, J. (2018) Restitution under an illegal contract: a Scots law perspective on Patel v. Mirza. European Review of Private Law, 26(2), pp. 273-282. (doi: 10.54648/erpl2018019)

[img] Text
282753.pdf - Published Version

154kB

Abstract

The illegality doctrine is an area where Scottish materials are sparse and conflicting. There have therefore been calls for law reform in Scotland, even along the lines of the United Kingdom Supreme Court (UKSC) decision in Patel v. Mirza. Moreover, Patel is already being mentioned with approval in Scottish courts and texts, and this suggests that any case which comes after it is likely to follow it closely.

Item Type:Articles (Other)
Keywords:Patal v Mirza; Scots Law; Illegal contracts.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:MacLeod, Mr John and Ezike, Dr Obiora
Authors: Ezike, O., and MacLeod, J.
Subjects:K Law > K Law (General)
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal Name:European Review of Private Law
Publisher:Kluwer Law International
ISSN:0928-9801
Published Online:09 February 2018
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2018 Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherland
First Published:First published in European Review of Private Law 26(2):273-281
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record