Unsettling West-centrism in the study of professional service firms

Boussebaa, M. (2024) Unsettling West-centrism in the study of professional service firms. Human Relations, 77(1), pp. 29-52. (doi: 10.1177/00187267221128262)

[img] Text
279758.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

169kB

Abstract

Over the last two decades, research on professional service firms has developed into an important subfield of management studies. In this article, I offer a postcolonial critique of this subfield. I show that it is not only built almost exclusively on studies conducted in the West but also generally presents its theorizing as though it were universal. This is despite the field being mostly focused on transnational firms. It is also despite professional service firm scholars generally being distinctly sensitive to (organizational) difference and having no steadfast commitment to positivism. Importantly, I also contend that professional service firm scholarship tends to construct an image of Western professionals as bearers of universal experience, knowledge and ‘professional’ culture while overlooking, if not obscuring, their role in neo-colonialism. Thus, what started as a useful effort to study an unusual – ‘professional’ – type of organization appears to have evolved into a West-centric scholarly enterprise. I urge scholars to recognize and interrogate the problem and work self-reflexively to address it in their own research – and I offer suggestions to that end. My contribution also has implications for the postcolonial critique in management studies and related efforts to decolonize the field.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Boussebaa, Professor Mehdi
Authors: Boussebaa, M.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Management
Journal Name:Human Relations
Publisher:SAGE
ISSN:0018-7267
ISSN (Online):1741-282X
Published Online:16 September 2022
Copyright Holders:Copyright © The Author(s) 2022
First Published:First published in Human Relations 77(1):29-52
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record