The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on wave one Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries

Stokes, J. , Turner, A. J., Anselmi, L., Morciano, M. and Hone, T. (2022) The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on wave one Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries. BMC Public Health, 22, 1113. (doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13546-6) (PMID:35659646) (PMCID:PMC9165709)

[img] Text
278695.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.



Background: Non-pharmaceutical interventions have been implemented around the world to control Covid-19 transmission. Their general effect on reducing virus transmission is proven, but they can also be negative to mental health and economies, and transmission behaviours can also change voluntarily, without mandated interventions. Their relative impact on Covid-19 attributed mortality, enabling policy selection for maximal benefit with minimal disruption, is not well established due to a lack of definitive methods. Methods: We examined variations in timing and strictness of nine non-pharmaceutical interventions implemented in 130 countries and recorded by the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT): 1) School closing; 2) Workplace closing; 3) Cancelled public events; 4) Restrictions on gatherings; 5) Closing public transport; 6) Stay at home requirements (‘Lockdown’); 7) Restrictions on internal movement; 8) International travel controls; 9) Public information campaigns. We used two time periods in the first wave of Covid-19, chosen to limit reverse causality, and fixed country policies to those implemented: i) prior to first Covid-19 death (when policymakers could not possibly be reacting to deaths in their own country); and, ii) 14-days-post first Covid-19 death (when deaths were still low, so reactive policymaking still likely to be minimal). We then examined associations with daily deaths per million in each subsequent 24-day period, which could only be affected by the intervention period, using linear and non-linear multivariable regression models. This method, therefore, exploited the known biological lag between virus transmission (which is what the policies can affect) and mortality for statistical inference. Results: After adjusting, earlier and stricter school (− 1.23 daily deaths per million, 95% CI − 2.20 to − 0.27) and workplace closures (− 0.26, 95% CI − 0.46 to − 0.05) were associated with lower Covid-19 mortality rates. Other interventions were not significantly associated with differences in mortality rates across countries. Findings were robust across multiple statistical approaches. Conclusions: Focusing on ‘compulsory’, particularly school closing, not ‘voluntary’ reduction of social interactions with mandated interventions appears to have been the most effective strategy to mitigate early, wave one, Covid-19 mortality. Within ‘compulsory’ settings, such as schools and workplaces, less damaging interventions than closing might also be considered in future waves/epidemics.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:Funding: This research received no specifc grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-proft sectors. JS was supported by a personal research Fellowship, funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC Grant Ref: MR/T027517/1).
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Stokes, Dr Jonathan
Authors: Stokes, J., Turner, A. J., Anselmi, L., Morciano, M., and Hone, T.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU
Journal Name:BMC Public Health
Publisher:BioMed Central
ISSN (Online):1471-2458
Published Online:03 June 2022
Copyright Holders:Copyright © The Author(s) 2022
First Published:First published in BMC Public Health 22: 1113
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record