Implementing a national diabetes prevention programme in England: lessons learned

Stokes, J. , Gellatly, J., Bower, P., Meacock, R., Cotterill, S., Sutton, M. and Wilson, P. (2019) Implementing a national diabetes prevention programme in England: lessons learned. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 991. (doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4809-3) (PMID:31870371) (PMCID:PMC6929377)

[img] Text
278675.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.



Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is preventable through lifestyle intervention. Diabetes prevention programmes (DPPs) aim to deliver prevention-based behaviour change interventions to reduce incidence. Such programmes vary from usual primary care in terms of where, how, and by whom they are delivered. Implementation is therefore likely to face new commissioning, incentive and delivery challenges. We report on the implementation of a national DPP in NHS England, and identify lessons learned in addressing the implementation challenges. Methods: In 2017/18, we conducted 20 semi-structured telephone interviews covering 16 sampled case sites with the designated lead(s) responsible for local implementation of the programme. Interviews explored the process of implementation, including organisation of the programme, expectations and attitudes to the programme, funding, target populations and referral and clinical pathways. We drew on constant comparative methods to analyse the data and generate over-arching themes. We complemented our qualitative data with a survey focused on variation in the financial incentives used across sites to ensure usual primary care services recruited patients to new providers. Results: We identified five over-arching areas of learning for implementing this large-scale programme: 1) managing new providers; 2) promoting awareness of services; 3) recruiting patients; 4) incentive payments; and 5) mechanisms for sharing learning. In general, tensions appeared to be caused by a lack of clear roles/responsibilities between hierarchical actors, and lack of communication. Both local sites and the national NHS coordination team gained experience through learning by doing. Initial tensions with roles and expectations have been worked out during implementation. Conclusions: Implementing a national disease prevention programme is a major task, and one that will be increasingly faced by health systems globally as they aim to adjust to demand pressures. We provide practical learning opportunities for the wider uptake and sustainability of prevention programmes. Future implementers might wish to define clear responsibilities for each actor prior to implementation, ensure early engagement with new providers, offer mechanisms/forums for sharing learning, generate evidence and provide advice on incentive payments, and prioritise public and professional awareness of the programme.

Item Type:Articles
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Stokes, Dr Jonathan
Authors: Stokes, J., Gellatly, J., Bower, P., Meacock, R., Cotterill, S., Sutton, M., and Wilson, P.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU
Journal Name:BMC Health Services Research
Publisher:BioMed Central
ISSN (Online):1472-6963
Published Online:23 December 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © The Author(s). 2019
First Published:First published in BMC Health Services Research 19(1):991
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons license

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record