Social meaning in archival interaction: a mixed-methods analysis of variation in rhoticity and past tense BE in Oldham

Dann, H., Ryan, S. D. and Drummond, R. (2022) Social meaning in archival interaction: a mixed-methods analysis of variation in rhoticity and past tense BE in Oldham. English Language and Linguistics, 26(4), pp. 861-887. (doi: 10.1017/s1360674322000119)

[img] Text
276270.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

999kB

Abstract

This article uses a mixed-methods approach to investigate the indexical fields of two variables, one phonological (rhoticity) and one morphosyntactic (past tense BE), in oral history interviews with speakers from Oldham (Greater Manchester, UK), born between 1907 and 1929. In a quantitative analysis of the variation, we account for a range of linguistic constraints, and find some evidence suggesting that rhoticity does not tend to cooccur with nonstandard past tense BE. To investigate this further, we employ a modified version of the Lectal Focusing in Interaction method (Sharma & Rampton 2015; Sharma 2018), allowing us to track the speakers’ variation in interaction. Using this method, we explore the indexical fields of the variables, which we suggest are potentially in conflict, perhaps explaining the observed pattern of non-cooccurrence. Overall, our analysis demonstrates how the status of rhoticity and past tense BE in relation to prescribed standard English, as well as shifting and stable variables, influences their indexical potential in interaction.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This research is part of the Manchester Voices project, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council. Project Grant: AH/S006125/1.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Ryan, Dr Sadie
Authors: Dann, H., Ryan, S. D., and Drummond, R.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Education
Journal Name:English Language and Linguistics
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:1360-6743
ISSN (Online):1469-4379
Published Online:25 July 2022
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 The Authors
First Published:First published in English Language and Linguistics 26(4): 861-887
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record