McCrudden, C., McGarry, J., O’Leary, B. and Schwartz, A. (2016) Why Northern Ireland’s institutions need stability. Government and Opposition, 51(1), pp. 30-58. (doi: 10.1017/gov.2014.28)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
Northern Ireland’s consociational institutions were reviewed by a committee of its Assembly in 2012–13. The arguments of both critics and exponents of the arrangements are of general interest to scholars of comparative politics, power-sharing and constitutional design. The authors of this article review the debates and evidence on the d’Hondt rule of executive formation, political designation, the likely impact of changing district magnitudes for assembly elections, and existing patterns of opposition and accountability. They evaluate the scholarly, political and legal literature before commending the merits of maintaining the existing system, including the rules under which the system might be modified in future.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Schwartz, Dr Alex |
| Authors: | McCrudden, C., McGarry, J., O’Leary, B., and Schwartz, A. |
| College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Law |
| Journal Name: | Government and Opposition |
| Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
| ISSN: | 0017-257X |
| ISSN (Online): | 1477-7053 |
| Published Online: | 11 August 2014 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Deposit and Record Details
Deposit and Record Details