Berryman, J. (2016) Nationalism, Britishness and the ‘souring’ of Australian national art. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 44(4), pp. 573-591. (doi: 10.1080/03086534.2016.1210250)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
This article investigates the nationalist historiography of the Heidelberg School, an Australian art movement from the Federation period, known for its iconic representations of national life and landscape. Drawing on recent scholarship of Australian nationalism, it questions conventional accounts of the Heidelberg School in Australian art history, especially those based on Bernard Smith’s radical interpretation of this movement. For Bernard Smith, and the generations of Australian art historians he influenced, the nationalism of the 1890s was a progressive force for national culture. Yet, in the post-Federation decades, national art declined (or ‘soured’) into a reactionary form of insular nationalism. By focusing on the ‘souring’ narrative of Australian national art, this article critiques the nationalist interpretation of the Heidelberg School. It explores an apparent contradiction: the role of Britishness in the construction of a distinctly Australian national art.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Berryman, Dr Jim |
| Authors: | Berryman, J. |
| College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Information Studies |
| Journal Name: | Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History |
| Publisher: | Taylor and Francis |
| ISSN: | 0308-6534 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1743-9329 |
| Published Online: | 16 August 2016 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Deposit and Record Details
Deposit and Record Details