Gombrich’s critique of Hauser’s Social History of Art

Berryman, J. (2017) Gombrich’s critique of Hauser’s Social History of Art. History of European Ideas, 43(5), pp. 494-506. (doi: 10.1080/01916599.2017.1373372)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

This article examines E.H. Gombrich’s critical appraisal of Arnold Hauser’s book, The Social History of Art. Hauser’s Social History of Art was published in 1951, a year after Gombrich’s bestseller, The Story of Art. Although written in Britain for an English-speaking public, both books had their origins in the intellectual history of Central Europe: Gombrich was an Austrian art historian and Hauser was Hungarian. Gombrich’s critique, published in The Art Bulletin in 1953, attacked Hauser’s dialectical materialism and his sociological interpretation of art history. Borrowing arguments from Karl Popper’s critique of historicism, Gombrich described Hauser’s work as collectivist and deterministic, tendencies at odds with his own conception of art history. However, in his readiness to label Hauser a proponent of historical materialism, Gombrich failed to recognize Hauser’s own criticism of deterministic theories of art, especially formalism. This article investigates Gombrich’s reasons for rejecting Hauser’s sociology of art. It argues Gombrich used Hauser as an ideological counterpoint to his own version of art history, avowedly liberal and individualist in outlook.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Berryman, Dr Jim
Authors: Berryman, J.
College/School:College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Information Studies
Journal Name:History of European Ideas
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:0191-6599
ISSN (Online):1873-541X
Published Online:11 September 2017

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record