Political messaging over time: A comparison of US presidential candidate Facebook posts and Tweets in 2016 and 2020

Stromer-Galley, J., Rossini, P. , Hemsley, J., Bolden, S. E. and McKernan, B. (2021) Political messaging over time: A comparison of US presidential candidate Facebook posts and Tweets in 2016 and 2020. Social Media and Society, 7(4), pp. 1-13. (doi: 10.1177/20563051211063465)

[img] Text
272737.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

520kB

Abstract

Political campaigns have a temporal nature, which means that the strategic environment shapes the nature of candidate communication, especially the stages of campaigning—from surfacing to the general election. As social media platforms have matured and political campaigns have normalized their use of those platforms in this decade, this study examines the 2016 and 2020 US presidential campaign communication on Facebook and Twitter using data from the Illuminating project at Syracuse University. Our objective is to explore how the stages of the campaign cycle shape political communication. We also explore social media platforms as additional factors. Moreover, given the distinct and anti-normative communication style of Donald Trump, we examine whether his communication is an outlier relative to his competition in the primaries and the general election, and while a challenger in 2016 and an incumbent in 2020. Our results suggest that campaign messaging changes over the stages of the campaign, with candidates more likely to advocate for themselves during the crowded primaries, and then engage in high volumes of calls to action in the general election. The 2016 posts were substantially more attack-focused than in 2020. There is some evidence to suggest that the global pandemic affected the ways in which campaigns used their social media accounts. Of note, campaigns seem to heavily rely on Facebook for all types of strategic communication, even as the academic community primarily analyzes Twitter. Finally, Trump’s sum-total of his discourse is less negative than Clinton’s in 2016 and more advocacy-focused, overall.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd
Keywords:Facebook, Twitter, political communication, political campaigns, campaign stages, supervised machine learning
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Rossini, Dr Patricia
Authors: Stromer-Galley, J., Rossini, P., Hemsley, J., Bolden, S. E., and McKernan, B.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics
Journal Name:Social Media and Society
Publisher:SAGE Publications
ISSN:2056-3051
ISSN (Online):2056-3051
Published Online:13 December 2021
Copyright Holders:Copyright © The Author(s) 2021
First Published:First published in Social Media and Society 7(4):1-13
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons Licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record