Deliberation across a space of reasons: assessing epistemic changes in group discussions

Maia, R. C.M., Cal, D., Oliveira, V. V., Vimeiro, A. C., Hauber, G. and Rossini, P. G.C. (2018) Deliberation across a space of reasons: assessing epistemic changes in group discussions. Human Communication Research, 44(4), pp. 399-426. (doi: 10.1093/hcr/hqy007)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Most research dealing with deliberation focuses on individual-level data, and the epistemic dimension of deliberation is rarely analyzed. Drawing on Habermas’s “space of reasons” account, we offer a novel analytical perspective on the variation in the stock of reasons in a given discussion, and disentangle how it transforms throughout the process. On the basis of data from face-to-face discussions involving two embattled groups in Brazil (police officers and slum residents), the findings revealed an expansion and diversification in the stock of reasons and, more importantly, a change in the nature of reasons regarding a political perspective. The results suggest that deliberation in an environment with competing considerations can yield epistemic gains beyond individuals’ behavior and competencies.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This work was supported by the following Brazilian research funding agencies: CNPq (grant numbers 308609/2015-8; 444293/2015-9); CAPES (INCT 88887.136417/2017-00) and Fapemig (00519-15).
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Rossini, Dr Patricia
Authors: Maia, R. C.M., Cal, D., Oliveira, V. V., Vimeiro, A. C., Hauber, G., and Rossini, P. G.C.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics
Journal Name:Human Communication Research
Publisher:Oxford University Press
ISSN:0360-3989
ISSN (Online):1468-2958
Published Online:21 June 2018

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record