Evaluating pain and analgesia effectiveness following routine castration in rabbits using behavior and facial expressions

Miller, A. L., Clarkson, J. M. , Quigley, C., Neville, V., Krall, C., Geijer-Simpson, A., Flecknell, P. A. and Leach, M. C. (2022) Evaluating pain and analgesia effectiveness following routine castration in rabbits using behavior and facial expressions. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 782486. (doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.782486) (PMID:35296059) (PMCID:PMC8918579)

[img] Text
266006.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

899kB

Abstract

Prevention of pain in rabbits is a priority for both welfare and validity of scientific data. We aimed to determine if the rabbit grimace scale (RbtGS) could be used as a viable, rapid assessment tool in two breeds of rabbit, Dutch belted (DB) and New Zealand white (NZW), following orchidectomy, as an adjunct to behavioral analysis. All animals received analgesia. Rabbits were filmed and their behavior was recorded at multiple time points pre- and post-orchidectomy. Observers then scored specific pain associated behaviors for analysis. Time matched footage was also scored using the rabbit grimace scale (RbtGS). Following surgery, rabbits showed significant increases in the duration spent displaying key pain associated behaviors at 1 and 5 h post-surgery. DB rabbits that received low dose meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg) showed significantly more pain behaviors at 1 and 5 h post-surgery compared to those administered a combination of higher dose meloxicam (0.6 mg/kg) and a lidocaine/bupivacaine local infusion. DB rabbits showed an increase in RbtGS score at both 1 and 5 h post-surgery. In the NZW rabbits, an increase in RbtGS score was only observed at 1 h post-surgery. Using behavioral analysis as the gold standard for comparison, the RbtGS was an effective means of determining when rabbits are painful following orchidectomy. Higher dose meloxicam (0.6 mg/kg) combined with local anesthetic was a more effective method of reducing pain, compared to lower dose meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg) alone.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This project was funded by NC3Rs, grant number: G1100563/1.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Clarkson, Dr Jasmine
Authors: Miller, A. L., Clarkson, J. M., Quigley, C., Neville, V., Krall, C., Geijer-Simpson, A., Flecknell, P. A., and Leach, M. C.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine
Journal Name:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Publisher:Frontiers Media
ISSN:2297-1769
ISSN (Online):2297-1769
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 Miller, Clarkson, Quigley, Neville, Krall, Geijer-Simpson, Flecknell and Leach
First Published:First published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9:782486
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons Licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record