Green, M. J. et al. (2022) The UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and smoking, alcohol consumption and vaping during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from eight longitudinal population surveys. BMC Medicine, 20, 345. (doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02511-0) (PMID:36127702) (PMCID:PMC9489267)
Text
264945.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 1MB |
Abstract
Background: Employment disruptions can impact smoking and alcohol consumption. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries implemented furlough schemes to prevent job loss. We examine how furlough was associated with smoking, vaping and alcohol consumption in the UK. Methods: Data from 27,841 participants in eight UK adult longitudinal surveys were analysed. Participants self-reported employment status and current smoking, current vaping and alcohol consumption (>4 days/week or 5+ drinks per typical occasion) both before and during the early stages of the pandemic (April–July 2020). Risk ratios were estimated within each study using modified Poisson regression, adjusting for a range of potential confounders, including pre-pandemic behaviour. Findings were synthesised using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Compared to stable employment and after adjustment for pre-pandemic characteristics, furlough was not associated with smoking (ARR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.95–1.16; I2: 10%), vaping (ARR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.74–1.08; I2: 0%) or drinking (ARR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.94–1.13; I2: 48%). There were similar findings for no longer being employed, and stable unemployment, though this varied by sex: stable unemployment was associated with smoking for women (ARR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.00–1.82; I2: 47%) but not men (0.84; 95% CI: 0.67–1.05; I2: 0%). No longer being employed was associated with vaping among women (ARR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.59–4.72; I2: 0%) but not men (ARR = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.83–1.87; I2: 0%). Conclusions: We found no clear evidence of furlough or unemployment having adverse impacts on smoking, vaping or drinking behaviours during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Differences in risk compared to those who remained employed were largely explained by pre-pandemic characteristics.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Katikireddi, Professor Vittal and Green, Dr Michael |
Authors: | Green, M. J., Maddock, J., Di Gessa, G., Wielgoszewska, B., Parsons, S., Griffith, G. J., Croft, J., Stevenson, A. J., Huggins, C. F., Booth, C., Wels, J., Silverwood, R. J., Patalay, P., Hughes, A. D., Chaturvedi, N., Howe, L. D., Fitzsimmons, E., Katikireddi, S., and Ploubidis, G. B. |
College/School: | College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU |
Journal Name: | BMC Medicine |
Publisher: | BioMed Central |
ISSN: | 1741-7015 |
ISSN (Online): | 1741-7015 |
Published Online: | 21 September 2022 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © The Author(s) 2022 |
First Published: | First published in BMC Medicine 20: 345 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced under a Creative Commons License |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record