Chaproniere, L. (2022) Is enhancement inherently ableist? Bioethics, 36(4), pp. 356-366. (doi: 10.1111/bioe.12982) (PMID:34921728)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
Transhumanists and other proponents of enhancement have been criticized for their attitude to disability. Melinda Hall argues that transhumanists denigrate disabled people by devaluing interdependence and vulnerability, and implying that disabled people are dangerous. It might also be thought that further development of enhancement technologies would have bad consequences within current, ableist and otherwise oppressive social contexts. This paper responds to these objections, arguing that enhancement needn't be in conflict with disability justice. While enhancements can be used and promoted in ways that reinforce ableism and other oppression, ways of mitigating these problems might be found by drawing on ideas from the disability rights movement, and social justice movements more broadly. The development of more accessible environments, and a general openness to surprises about which traits promote well-being, can help to create conditions under which people have genuine choice over which enhancement technologies, if any, to use.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Chaproniere, Lysette |
| Authors: | Chaproniere, L. |
| College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities |
| Journal Name: | Bioethics |
| Publisher: | Wiley |
| ISSN: | 0269-9702 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1467-8519 |
| Published Online: | 18 December 2021 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Altmetric
Altmetric