Integrating advances in population and evolutionary ecology with conservation strategy through long‐term studies of red‐billed choughs

Reid, J. M., Bignal, E., Bignal, S., McCracken, D. I., Fenn, S. R., Trask, A. E. and Monaghan, P. (2022) Integrating advances in population and evolutionary ecology with conservation strategy through long‐term studies of red‐billed choughs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 91(1), pp. 20-34. (doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13615) (PMID:34679183)

[img] Text
258571.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.



Conceptual and methodological advances in population and evolutionary ecology are often pursued with the ambition that they will help identify demographic, ecological and genetic constraints on population growth rate (λ), and ultimately facilitate evidence‐based conservation. However, such advances are often decoupled from conservation practice, impeding translation of scientific understanding into effective conservation and of conservation‐motivated research into wider conceptual understanding. We summarise key outcomes from long‐term studies of a red‐billed chough Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax population of conservation concern, where we proactively aimed to achieve the dual and interacting objectives of advancing population and evolutionary ecology and advancing effective conservation. Estimation of means, variances and covariances in key vital rates from individual‐based demographic data identified temporal and spatial variation in subadult survival as key constraints on λ, and simultaneously provided new insights into how vital rates can vary as functions of demographic structure, natal conditions and parental life history. Targeted analyses showed that first‐year survival increased with prey abundance, implying that food limitation may constrain λ. First‐year survival then decreased dramatically, threatening population viability and prompting emergency supplementary feeding interventions. Detailed evaluations suggested that the interventions successfully increased first‐year survival in some years and additionally increased adult survival and successful reproduction, thereby feeding back to inform intervention refinements and understanding of complex ecological constraints on λ. Genetic analyses revealed novel evidence of expression of a lethal recessive allele, and demonstrated how critically small effective population size can arise, thereby increasing inbreeding and loss of genetic variation. Population viability analyses parameterised with all available demographic and genetic data showed how ecological and genetic constraints can interact to limit population viability, and identified ecological management as of primacy over genetic management to ensure short‐term persistence of the focal population. This case study demonstrates a full iteration through the sequence of primary science, evidence‐based intervention, quantitative evaluation and feedback that is advocated in conservation science but still infrequently achieved. It thereby illustrates how pure science advances informed conservation actions to ensure the (short‐term) stability of the target population, and how conservation‐motivated analyses fed back to advance fundamental understanding of population processes.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:Aspects of the work were funded by Natural Environment Research Council, NatureScot, University of Aberdeen, University of Glasgow, RSPB, Scottish Government's Strategic Research Programme, Scotland's Rural College, Killam Trusts and the Royal Society (details in Appendix S2).
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Monaghan, Professor Pat
Authors: Reid, J. M., Bignal, E., Bignal, S., McCracken, D. I., Fenn, S. R., Trask, A. E., and Monaghan, P.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine
Journal Name:Journal of Animal Ecology
ISSN (Online):1365-2656
Published Online:22 October 2021
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 The Authors
First Published:First published in Journal of Animal Ecology 91(1): 20-34
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record