Primers or Reminders? The Effects of Existing Review Comments on Code Review

Spadini, D., Çalikli, G. and Bacchelli, A. (2020) Primers or Reminders? The Effects of Existing Review Comments on Code Review. In: ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering, 27 Jun - 29 Jul 2020, pp. 1171-1182. ISBN 9781450371216 (doi: 10.1145/3377811.3380385)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.


In contemporary code review, the comments put by reviewers on a specific code change are immediately visible to the other reviewers involved. Could this visibility prime new reviewers' attention (due to the human's proneness to availability bias), thus biasing the code review outcome? In this study, we investigate this topic by conducting a controlled experiment with 85 developers who perform a code review and a psychological experiment. With the psychological experiment, we find that ≈70% of participants are prone to availability bias. However, when it comes to the code review, our experiment results show that participants are primed only when the existing code review comment is about a type of bug that is not normally considered; when this comment is visible, participants are more likely to find another occurrence of this type of bug. Moreover, this priming effect does not influence reviewers' likelihood of detecting other types of bugs. Our findings suggest that the current code review practice is effective because existing review comments about bugs in code changes are not negative primers, rather positive reminders for bugs that would otherwise be overlooked during code review. Data and materials:

Item Type:Conference Proceedings
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Calikli, Dr Handan Gul
Authors: Spadini, D., Çalikli, G., and Bacchelli, A.
College/School:College of Science and Engineering > School of Computing Science
Data DOI:10.5281/zenodo.3653856

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record