What are the implications of applying equipoise in planning Citizens Basic Income pilots in Scotland?

McCartney, G. , Craig, N., Myers, F., Hearty, W. and Barclay, C. (2021) What are the implications of applying equipoise in planning Citizens Basic Income pilots in Scotland? Public Health Ethics, 14(1), pp. 109-116. (doi: 10.1093/phe/phab001) (PMID:34234843) (PMCID:PMC8254643)

[img] Text
253063.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

184kB

Abstract

We have been asked to consider the feasibility of piloting a Citizens’ Basic Income (CBI): a basic, unconditional, universal, individual, regular payment that would replace aspects of social security and be introduced alongside changes to taxes. Piloting and evaluating a CBI as a Cluster Randomized Control Trial (RCT) raises the question of whether intervention and comparison groups would be in equipoise, and thus whether randomization would be ethical. We believe that most researchers would accept that additional income, or reduced conditions on receiving income would be likely to improve health, especially at lower income levels. However, there are genuine uncertainties about the impacts on other outcomes, and CBI as a mechanism of providing income. There is also less consensus amongst civil servants and politicians about the impacts on health, and substantial disagreement about whether these would outweigh other impacts. We believe that an RCT is ethical because of these uncertainties. We also argue that the principle of equipoise should apply to randomized and non-randomized trials; that randomization is a fairer means of allocating to intervention and comparison groups; and that there is an ethical case for experimentation to generate higher-quality evidence for policymaking that may otherwise do harm.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:The Improvement Service received specific Scottish Government funding to undertake the work on Citizens’ Basic Income. This provided the funding for a secondment for WH during the time of this work.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:McCartney, Professor Gerard and Hearty, Wendy
Authors: McCartney, G., Craig, N., Myers, F., Hearty, W., and Barclay, C.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Sociology Anthropology and Applied Social Sciences
Journal Name:Public Health Ethics
Publisher:Oxford University Press
ISSN:1754-9973
ISSN (Online):1754-9981
Published Online:25 January 2021
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 The Authors
First Published:First published in Public Health Ethics 14(1): 109-116
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record