Adekola, J., Dale, V. H. M., & Gardiner, K. (2017). Development of an institutional framework to guide transitions into enhanced blended learning in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 25, 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1973Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., & Poirot, J. (2009). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Computers & Education, 53(3), 575-590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.015Armstrong, E. J. (2019). Maximising motivators for technology-enhanced learning for further education teachers: moving beyond the early adopters in a time of austerity. Research in Learning Technology, 27(0). doi:10.25304/rlt.v27.2032Bennett, L. (2014). Learning from the early adopters: developing the digital practitioner. Research in Learning Technology, 22(1), 21453. Retrieved from https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/download/1450/pdf_1Bobic, M., Davis, E., & Cunningham, R. (1999). The Kirton adaptation-innovation inventory: validity issues, practical questions. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(2), 18-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9901900204Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors' adoption and use ofonline tools in face-to-face teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001Bryant, P. (2015). There There -Risk aversion, ambient conservatism and the institutional equilibrium of pedagogical change [blog post]. Retrieved from http://peterbryant.smegradio.com/?p=530Christensen, C. M., & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. Forum for the Future of Higher Education, 47-53. Retrieved from http://www.ncmeresource.org/lcbp/pdf/webinar1/The%20Innovative%20University-Changing%20the%20DNA%20of%20Higher%20Education.pdfCoughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. British journal of nursing, 16(11), 658-663. doi:https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23681Cousin, G. (2009). Chapter 1. Framing higher education research. In Researching learning in higher education. An introduction to contemporary methods and approaches.(pp. 1-15). New York & Abingdon: Routledge.Ee, J., Seng, T., & Kwang, N. (2007). Styles of creativity: Adaptors and innovators in a Singapore context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(3), 364-373. doi:10.1007/BF03026466Ellis, R. A., Ginns, P., & Piggott, L. (2009). E‐learning in higher education: some key aspectsand their relationship to approaches to study. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(3), 303-318. doi:10.1080/07294360902839909Emmer, E. T., & Hickman, J. (1991). Teacher efficacy in classroom management and discipline. Educational and psychological measurement, 51(3), 755-765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164491513027Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551Fresen, J. W. (2011). Factors influencing lecturer uptake of e-learning. Teaching English with Technology, 11(1), 81-97. González, C. (2012). The relationship between approaches to teaching, approaches to e-teaching and perceptions of the teaching situation in relation to e-learning among higher education teachers. Instructional Science, 40(6), 975-998. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9198-xHaigh, N. (2005). Everyday conversation as a context for professional learning and development. International Journal for Academic Development, 10(1), 3-16. doi:10.1080/13601440500099969Hixon, E., Buckenmeyer, J., Barczyk, C., Feldman, L., & Zamojski, H. (2012). Beyond the early adopters of online instruction: Motivating the reluctant majority. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 102-107. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.005Hood Cattaneo, K. (2017). Telling Active Learning Pedagogies Apart: from theory to practice. 2017, 6(2), 9. doi:10.7821/naer.2017.7.237Hsu, P.-S. (2016). Examining current beliefs, practices and barriers about technology integration: a case study. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 60(1), 30-40. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0014-3Jacobsen, M. (2000). Excellent teaching and early adopters of instructional technology. Paper presented at the ED-MEDIA 2000 12th World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, June 26-July 1, 2000, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Jones, S. R., Torres, V., & Arminio, J. (2006). Choices and consequences of mixing methods in qualitative research. In Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues(pp. 135-151). New York and Abingdon: Routledge.Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M., & Martens, R. (2017). Teachers’ innovative behaviour: The importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-14. doi:10.1080/00313831.2017.1306803Lockee,B. B. (2021). Online education in the post-COVID era. Nature Electronics, 4(1), 5-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0Lunde, J. P., & Wilhite, M. S. (1996). Innovative teaching and teaching improvement. In L. Richlin (Ed.), To Improve the Academy(pp. 155-167). Stillwater, OK.Maguire, D., Dale, L., & Pauli, M. (2020). Learning and teaching reimagined: A new dawn for higher education?Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/reports/learning-and-teaching-reimagined-a-new-dawn-for-higher-educationMcGeown, V. (1980). Dimensions of Teacher Innovativeness. British Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 147-163. doi:10.1080/0141192800060204Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342. doi:10.1080/14759390000200096Novotn, P. (2002). Teachers and innovation; Opening stage of an exploration of today's practice. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002337.htm
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice | Vol 9| Issue 2 (2021)Early adopters versus the majority: Characteristics and implications for academic development and institutional change67©2021Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic PracticePrestridge, S. (2017). Examining the shaping of teachers’ pedagogical orientation for the use of technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1-15. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2016.1258369Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations(5th ed. ed.). New York, N.Y.: Simon & Schuster.Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research. British journal of nursing, 16(12), 738-745. doi:https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.12.23726Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., & Freitas, S. d. (2010). Rethinking Learning for a Digital Age: How Learners are Shaping their Own Experiences. New York: Routledge.Shen, P., & Slater, P. (2021). The Effect of Occupational Stress and Coping Strategies on Mental Health and Emotional Well-Being among University Academic Staff during the COVID-19 Outbreak. International Education Studies, 14(3), 82-95. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n3p82Smith, J., & Oliver, M. (2000). Academic development: A framework for embedding learning technology. International Journal for Academic Development, 5(2), 129-137. doi:10.1080/13601440050200734Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a Model of Explaining Teachers’ Innovative Behavior:A Literature Review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430-471. doi:10.3102/0034654314557949van Eekelen, I. M., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Vermunt, J. D. (2005). Self-Regulation in Higher Education Teacher Learning. Higher education, 50(3), 447-471. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25068106Vogel, M. (2010). Engaging academics in professional development for technology-enhanced learning. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/engaging-academics-professional-development-technology-enhanced-learningWatty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2016). Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, 36, 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003Wilson, G., & Stacey, E. (2004). Online interaction impacts on learning: Teaching the teachers to teach online. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1366Zhu, C., Wang, D., Cai, Y., & Engels, N. (2013). What core competencies are related to teachers' innovative teaching? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 9-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.753984