Exploring GP work in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: a secondary analysis

McCallum, M. and Macdonald, S. (2021) Exploring GP work in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: a secondary analysis. BJGP Open, 5(6), BJGPO.2021.0117. (doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0117) (PMID:34465578)

[img] Text
250276.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

891kB

Abstract

Background: There is a GP workforce crisis, particularly in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation where levels of multimorbidity and social complexity are higher than in areas of low socioeconomic deprivation. How this impacts GP work, and how GPs manage workload has not been fully explored. Aim: To explore GP work in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation and the strategies GPs employ, using Corbin and Strauss’s framework on managing chronic illness as an analytical lens. Design & setting: Secondary analysis of qualitative in-depth interviews with GPs working with populations experiencing high levels of socioeconomic deprivation. Method: Secondary analysis of in-depth interviews with GPs working in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation (n = 10). Results: All three types of work defined by Corbin and Strauss (everyday, illness, and biographical) were described, and one additional type: emotional (work managing GPs’ own emotions). The context of socioeconomic deprivation, increased multimorbidity plus social complexity (’multimorbidity plus’), influenced GP work. Healthcare systems and self-management strategies did not meet patients’ needs, which meant the resulting gap created extra everyday work, often unrecognised (which was a source of frustration). GPs also described taking on ’illness work’ for patients who were either overwhelmed or unable to do it. Some GPs described biographical work, asserting their professional role against demands from patients and other professionals. Work aligning with personal values was important in sustaining motivation; for example, being part of a strong team and having outside professional interests appeared to build resilience. Conclusion: GPs working in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation experience different types of work from those working in areas of low socioeconomic deprivation; much of which is unrecognised and not resourced. Current strategies to reduce burnout could be more effective if the complexity of different types of work was addressed. In addition, personal values, practice teams, and outside professional interests all need to be supported.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:McCallum, Dr Marianne and Macdonald, Professor Sara
Authors: McCallum, M., and Macdonald, S.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > General Practice and Primary Care
Journal Name:BJGP Open
Publisher:Royal College of General Practitioners
ISSN:2398-3795
ISSN (Online):2398-3795
Published Online:31 August 2021
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 The Authors
First Published:First published in BJGP Open 5(6): BJGPO.2021.0117
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record