Furgał, U. (2021) Interpreting EU reversion rights: why ‘use-it-or-lose-it’ should be the guiding principle. European Intellectual Property Review, 43(5), pp. 283-291.
![]() |
Text
248952.pdf - Accepted Version 375kB |
Publisher's URL: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I1B34F2809F1011EB9855BDB8D028861A/View/FullText.html
Abstract
This article presents the findings from a comprehensive mapping of copyright reversion provisions which are currently or were historically a part of the laws of EU Member States. The analysis identifies patterns and argues for a "use-it-or-lose-it" guiding principle that should govern the whole term of creator contracts. This principle is being made explicit within EU copyright law by a new revocation right provided by art.22 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market . Whereas the current reversion rights landscape is fragmented, Member States’ preference for use-based provisions is clear. The understanding of "use", especially in the digital context is, however, vague. This article proposes a way to address those shortcomings while bringing all reversion rights under a "use-it-or-lose-it" umbrella during the implementation process of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive .
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Furgal, Dr Ula |
Authors: | Furgał, U. |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Law |
Journal Name: | European Intellectual Property Review |
Journal Abbr.: | EIPR |
Publisher: | Sweet & Maxwell |
ISSN: | 0142-0461 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2021 Thomson Reuters |
First Published: | First published in European Intellectual Property Review 43(5): 283-291 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy |
Related URLs: |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record