Inequities and inequalities in outdoor walking groups: a scoping review

Rigby, B. P. , Dodd-Reynolds, C. J. and Oliver, E. J. (2020) Inequities and inequalities in outdoor walking groups: a scoping review. Public Health Reviews, 41, 4. (doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-00119-4) (PMID:32190410) (PMCID:PMC7071574)

[img] Text
243686.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.



Background: Outdoor walking groups are widely-used programmes aimed at improving physical activity and health outcomes. Despite being promoted as accessible and inclusive, emerging work highlights participation biases based on gender, age and socioeconomic status, for example. To explicate the impact of outdoor walking groups on physical activity inequities, we conducted a scoping review of published outdoor walking group literatures. Specifically, we critically examined: (a) equity integration strategies; (b) intervention reach; (c) effectiveness; and (d) potential social determinants of engagement relating to the World Health Organization’s conceptual framework. Methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review protocol was used to develop a comprehensive search strategy and identify relevant academic and grey literatures, which were screened using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were organised by Cochrane PROGRESS-Plus equity characteristics and a narrative summary was presented for each thematic area. Findings: Sixty-two publications were included. Key findings were: (a) some evidence of targeted intervention trials. Large-scale national programmes were tailored to regional activity and health needs, which may contribute toward addressing inequities. However, participant demographics seldom informed reported analyses; (b) participation was more likely among white, more socioeconomically advantaged, middle-to-older aged, female and able-bodied adults; (c) positive physical and psychological outcomes were unlikely to extend along social gradients; and (d) interventions primarily addressed intermediary determinants (e.g. psychosocial barriers; material resource). Social capital (e.g. friend-making) was identified as potentially important for addressing physical activity inequalities. Conclusions: The published literature on outdoor walking groups leaves unanswered questions regarding participation inequalities, with implications for future physical activity promotion. Currently, participation in outdoor walking groups is typically more prevalent among advantaged subpopulations. We make recommendations for research and practice to address these issues, as well as aid the translation of existing knowledge into practice. We advocate increased focus on the social determinants of engagement. A more consistent approach to collecting and analysing participant socio-demographic data is required. Our findings also support recommendations that appropriate tailoring of universal programmes to community needs and embedding strategies to increase social cohesion are important in developing equitable programmes.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This research was supported by BR’s PhD grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ERSC), UK (grant number: ES/J500092/1), and funding from the Wolfson Institute for Health and Wellbeing Physical Activity Special Interest Group, Durham University (ref: 200204).
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Rigby, Dr Benjamin
Authors: Rigby, B. P., Dodd-Reynolds, C. J., and Oliver, E. J.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU
Journal Name:Public Health Reviews
Publisher:BioMed Central
ISSN (Online):2107-6952
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2020 The Authors
First Published:First published in Public Health Reviews 41: 4
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record