An ex vivo biomechanical comparison of two suture materials and two pattern combinations for equine superficial digital flexor tendon tenorrhaphy

Giacchi, A. and McMaster, M. A. (2021) An ex vivo biomechanical comparison of two suture materials and two pattern combinations for equine superficial digital flexor tendon tenorrhaphy. Veterinary Surgery, 50(5), pp. 1137-1146. (doi: 10.1111/vsu.13658) (PMID:33982804)

Abstract

Objective: To compare biomechanical characteristics of three‐loop pulley (3LP) pattern versus Bunnell technique (BT) using polydioxanone (PDS) suture; to determine the influence of polyester tape (PT) versus PDS on the BT for equine superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) tenorrhaphy; to compare BT with PT versus 3LP with PDS. Study Design: Ex vivo biomechanical study. Sample Population: Forty equine forelimb SDFT. Methods: Two experiments were performed: (1) 10 SDFT pairs were repaired with 3LP or BT using PDS; (2) 10 SDFT pairs were repaired with PDS or PT using BT. Load at failure, mode of failure, load at 2 mm gap, and gap at failure were obtained using a material testing machine. Results: In experiment 1, 3LP + PDS1 had higher loads at failure (p < .001) and at 2 mm gap (p < .001), and smaller gap at failure than BT + PDS1 (p = .024). In experiment 2, BT + PT2 had higher loads at failure (p < .001) and at 2 mm gap (p = .001), and larger gap at failure (p = .004) than the BT + PDS2. 3LP + PDS1 and BT + PT2 mostly failed by suture/implant pull‐through while BT + PDS failed by suture breakage. BT + PT2 had greater load (p = .035) and gap at failure (p < .001) than 3LP + PDS1, with no difference in load at 2 mm gap (p = .14). Conclusion: The use of BT may be justified over 3LP if combined with PT. However, the larger size of the PT required stab incisions in the tendon for placement and was subjectively more difficult to place than PDS. Clinical Significance: The BT + PT, although the strongest among the tested repairs, would only be able to withstand 12%–24% of the load encountered by the SDFT at walk.

• Item Type: Articles
• Additional Information: This project was supported by the Weipers Equine Centre Fund, University of Glasgow School of Veterinary Medicine [145974‐05].
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: McMaster, Miss Mattie and Giacchi, Andrea
• Authors: Giacchi, A., and McMaster, M. A.
• College/School: College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine
• Journal Name: Veterinary Surgery
• Publisher: Wiley
• ISSN: 0161-3499
• ISSN (Online): 1532-950X
• Published Online: 13 May 2021
• Copyright Holders: Copyright © 2021 The Authors
• First Published: First published in Veterinary Surgery 50(5): 1137-1146
• Publisher Policy: Reproduced under a Creative Commons License