Enough is too much: the excessiveness objection to sufficientarianism

Knight, C. (2022) Enough is too much: the excessiveness objection to sufficientarianism. Economics and Philosophy, 38(2), pp. 275-299. (doi: 10.1017/S0266267121000171)

[img] Text
240664.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

692kB

Abstract

The standard version of sufficientarianism maintains that providing people with enough, or as close to enough as is possible, is lexically prior to other distributive goals. This article argues that this is excessive – more than distributive justice allows – in four distinct ways. These concern the magnitude of advantage, the number of beneficiaries, responsibility and desert, and above-threshold distribution. Sufficientarians can respond by accepting that providing enough unconditionally is more than distributive justice allows, instead balancing sufficiency against other considerations.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Knight, Dr Carl
Authors: Knight, C.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics
Journal Name:Economics and Philosophy
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:0266-2671
ISSN (Online):1474-0028
Published Online:29 June 2021
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 The Author
First Published:First published in Economics and Philosophy 38(2): 275-299
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record