Comparison of CA-125 and Standard Definitions of Progression of Ovarian Cancer in the Intergroup Trial of Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin and Cyclophosphamide

Rustin, G. et al. (2006) Comparison of CA-125 and Standard Definitions of Progression of Ovarian Cancer in the Intergroup Trial of Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin and Cyclophosphamide. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(1), pp. 45-51. (doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.01.2757)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Purpose A definition for progression of ovarian cancer has been proposed based on either a confirmed doubling of CA-125 levels from the upper limit of normal or from the nadir level if levels are persistently elevated. Retrospectively, we determined whether the use of this CA-125 definition in a randomized trial would have shown the same magnitude of difference between the treatment arms as was shown when the standard progression definition was used. Patients and Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 680 patients in the Taxol Intergroup Trial with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma, of whom 628 were assessable according to CA-125. The date of progression according to clinical or radiologic criteria was compared with the date of progression according to CA-125. Results Of the 628 patients assessable for both definitions, 556 clinical or radiologic progressions were determined compared with 389 according to the CA-125 definition. There was a highly significant difference in the hazard of progression between the paclitaxel and cisplatin arm (TP) compared with the cyclophosphannide and cisplatin arm (CP) when either standard or CA-125 criteria were used to define progression (standard, P =.002; CA-125, P =.011). The hazard ratio of TP/CP over time was similar when comparing the different methods of defining progression. Conclusion The results of this analysis show that the magnitude of the therapeutic benefit was similar whether CA-125 or standard criteria were used to define progression.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Cassidy, Professor James
Authors: Rustin, G., Timmers, P., Nelstrop, A., Shreeves, G., Bentzen, S., Baron, B., Piccart, M., Bertelsen, K., Stuart, G., Cassidy, J., and Eisenhauer, E.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cancer Sciences
Journal Name:Journal of Clinical Oncology
ISSN:0732-183X

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record