Are ejection fractions from gated SPECT perfusion studies clinically useful? A comparison with radionuclide ventriculography

Wright, G.A., McDade, M., Keeble, W., Martin, W. and Hutton, I. (2001) Are ejection fractions from gated SPECT perfusion studies clinically useful? A comparison with radionuclide ventriculography. Physiological Measurement, 22(2), pp. 413-422.

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Introduction and objective. This study was designed to evaluate the reproducibility of ejection fraction (EF) and ventricular volume measurements obtained with single photon emission computed tomography (gated-SPECT), and to assess the correlation between EF values obtained with this method and blood pool planar radionuclide ventriculography. Patients and method. A total of 55 patients were included (37 men, mean age 61.3 years) upon referral to two nuclear cardiology units for diagnosis (50%) or follow-up of known coronary artery disease. In a standard 2-day protocol, patients received a dose of [ 99mTc]tetrofosmin (800 MBq) at stress and at rest. Two resting gated-SPECT studies were performed. QGS software was used to obtain left ventricular EF, end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV). Forty-nine patients agreed to undergo blood pool ventriculography on the third day. Results. Interobserver variability was 0.5 (2.6)% (r=0.99) for EF, 1.9 (10.7) mL for EDV (r=0.98) and 0.5 (5.4) mL for ESV (r=0.99). Interassay variability was 2 (5.1)% (r=0.94) for EF, 4.5 (8.6) mL for EDV (r=0.99) and 3.4 (6.6) mL for ESV (r=0.99). The correlation between gated-SPECT EF and blood pool EF was suboptimal (r=0.75, 95% CI, 0.59-0.85). Conclusions. There was excellent interobserver and interassay reproducibility for left ventricular functional parameters measured with gated-SPECT and QGS software, and this method can be used for serial evaluations of ventricular function. Although the correlation between values obtained with gated-SPECT and blood pool ventriculography was acceptable, the differences show that the two techniques cannot be considered equivalent.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:McDade, Mrs Mairi
Authors: Wright, G.A., McDade, M., Keeble, W., Martin, W., and Hutton, I.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences
Journal Name:Physiological Measurement

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record