Stepping into the labour market from the VET sector in China: student perceptions and experiences

Wang, G. (2022) Stepping into the labour market from the VET sector in China: student perceptions and experiences. Studies in Continuing Education, 44(3), pp. 392-408. (doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2021.1872522)

[img] Text
227606.pdf - Accepted Version

347kB

Abstract

The Chinese Government is clear that investment is needed to upskill the workforce, yet VET students, who will play a key role in the upskilling, continue to be positioned at the bottom of the educational hierarchy and suffer considerable societal prejudice. This paper presents new findings on Chinese VET students’ perceptions of the job market and career possibilities in the context of the negatively stereotyped VET system. The findings are analysed through the lens of Gramsci’s hegemonic power and with reference to Bauman’s individualisation. A lack of confidence was found among the VET students who were about to enter the labour market; moreover, they exhibited a passive acceptance of whatever jobs were available, rather than mindfully choosing. Analysis of the findings suggests that the students gave their active consent to the hegemonic human capital form of thinking and accepted their perceived ‘inadequacy’ and unfavourable places in the division of labour. They were under the impression that they needed to take responsibility for the choices they made as ‘[our] chances all come down to us'. The study concludes that this individualising force could sustain hegemonic control as well as provide the ‘flexible workers’ needed by an economy influenced by neoliberalism.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Wang, Dr Geng
Authors: Wang, G.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Education
Journal Name:Studies in Continuing Education
Publisher:Taylor and Francis
ISSN:0158-037X
ISSN (Online):1470-126X
Published Online:18 January 2021
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
First Published:First published in Studies in Continuing Education 44(3):392-408
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record