Aesthetic functionality at a crossroads: what a troublesome doctrine can learn from its past

Wang, X. (2020) Aesthetic functionality at a crossroads: what a troublesome doctrine can learn from its past. Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 19(3), pp. 357-395.

[img] Text
225839.pdf - Published Version


Publisher's URL:


With the rise of branding and marketing, firms started using trade dress such as product features or packages to identify themselves. Some firms claim an exclusive trademark right on their trade dress. However, granting a trademark right to some trade dresses might hinder competition. For example, if one firm claims trademark on the heart-shaped candy box, it will prevent others from using the same package to compete in the Valentine’s Day sweets market. So U.S. courts developed a doctrine called aesthetic functionality to avoid the competition hindrance consequence. Aesthetic functionality refers to the situation where a trade dress has the aesthetic value and consumers buy the product largely due to that value. Once a court decides a trade dress, such as the heart-shaped box, is aesthetically functional, the trade dress cannot be a trademark owned by any one firm, and every firm can use it in the market. U.S. courts use aesthetic functionality as a legal ground to reject trademark protection of a trade dress when granting such protection would unfairly disadvantage competitors

Item Type:Articles
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Wang, Dr Xiaoren
Authors: Wang, X.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal Name:Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
Publisher:Chicago-Kent College of Law
Published Online:25 June 2020
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2020 The Author
First Published:First published in Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property 19(3): 357-395
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record