The prospects of emotional dogmatism

Harrison, E. (2021) The prospects of emotional dogmatism. Philosophical Studies, 178(8), pp. 2535-2555. (doi: 10.1007/s11098-020-01561-5)

[img] Text
223422.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

256kB

Abstract

The idea that emotional experience is capable of lending immediate and defeasible justification to evaluative belief has been amassing significant support in recent years. The proposal that it is my anger, say, that justifies my belief that I’ve been wronged putatively provides us with an intuitive and naturalised explanation as to how we receive epistemic justification for a rich catalogue of our evaluative beliefs. However, despite the fact that this justificatory thesis of emotion is fundamentally an epistemological proposal, comparatively little has been done to explicitly isolate what it is about emotions that bestows them with justificatory ability. The purpose of this paper is to provide a novel and thorough analysis into the prospects of phenomenology-based—or dogmatist—views of emotional justification. By surveying and rejecting various instantiations of the emotional dogmatist view, I endeavour to provide an inductive case for the conclusion that emotional phenomenology cannot be the seat of the emotions’ power to immediately justify evaluative belief.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Harrison, Eilidh
Authors: Harrison, E.
College/School:College of Arts & Humanities
Journal Name:Philosophical Studies
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0554-0739
ISSN (Online):2153-8379
Published Online:06 October 2020
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2020 The Author
First Published:First published in Philosophical Studies 178(8): 2535-2555
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record