Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., Diamond, M., Diskin, A., Levine, R. and Scotto, T. J. (2004) Strategic abandonment or sincerely second best? The 1999 Israeli Prime Ministerial election. Journal of Politics, 66(3), pp. 706-728. (doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00273.x)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
The Israeli election for Prime Minister in 1999 featured five candidates. Three, including a major, centrally located candidate, Yitzhak Mordechai, withdrew from competition during the two days before the voting. Mordechai withdrew in large measure in reaction to the strategic decisions of voters, that is, some voters who favored him deserted his candidacy as his poll standings declined. We use surveys conducted during the 1999 campaign to estimate models of strategic voting behavior based on the multicandidate calculus of voting. We find that strategic voting in the Israeli, majority-with-runoff electoral system closely resembled the level and nature of strategic voting found in the more nearly pure plurality systems for which the statistical models were originally developed. The result is support for the reasoning Mordechai provided for his decision, illustrating the interlocking nature of strategic decisions between candidates and voters.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Scotto, Professor Thomas |
| Authors: | Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., Diamond, M., Diskin, A., Levine, R., and Scotto, T. J. |
| College/School: | College of Social Sciences |
| Journal Name: | Journal of Politics |
| Publisher: | University of Chicago Press |
| ISSN: | 0022-3816 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1468-2508 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Altmetric
Altmetric