Aguinis, H., & Vaschetto, S. J. (2011). Editorial
responsibility: Managing the publishing process to do good and do well. Management and
Organization Review, 7, 407–422.
Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange encounters. London:
Routledge.
Ahmed, S. (2004). Declarations of whiteness: The
non-performativity of anti-racism. Borderlands
E-Journal, 3(2). Available online at www.borderlands.net
Cutcher et al. 17
Alvesson, M. (2013). Do we have something to say?
From re-search to roi-search and back again.
Organization, 20, 79–90.
Alvesson, M., & Gabriel, Y. (2013). Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity
in organizational research and publications.
Academy of Management Learning & Education,
12, 245–263.
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2011a). Decolonializing discourse: Critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis. Human Relations,
64, 1121–1146.
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2011b).
Organizational discourse analysis – well done
or too rare? A reply to our critics. Human
Relations, 64, 1193–1202.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating
research questions through problematization.
Academy of Management Review, 36, 247–
271.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more
imaginative and innovative research. Journal of
Management Studies, 50, 128–152.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2014). Habitat and
habitus: Boxed-in versus box-breaking research.
Organization Studies, 35, 967–987.
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2019). Neo-institutional
theory and Organization Studies: A mid-life crisis? Organization Studies, 40, 199–218.
Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is
the expert: A not knowing approach to therapy.
In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Therapy
as social construction (pp. 25–39). London:
SAGE Publications.
Anderson, V., Elliott, C., & Callahan, J. (2020). Power,
powerlessness, and journal ranking lists: The
marginalization of fields of practice. Academy
of Management Learning & Education https://
journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amle.2019.0037.
Argyres, N. (2019). Lessons About organizational
research method. Journal of Management
Inquiry, 28, 269–270.
Banerjee, S. B. (2011). Voices of the governed: Towards a theory of the translocal.
Organization, 18, 323–344.
Banks, G. E., O’Boyle, J., Pollack, C., White,
J., Batchelor, C., Whelpley, K., Abston, A.,
Barkema, H. G., Chen, X. P., George, G., Luo,
Y., & Tsui, A. S. (2015). West meets East: New
concepts and theories. Academy of Management
Journal, 58(2), 460–479.
Barley, S. R. (2016). 60th anniversary essay:
Ruminations on how we became a mystery
house and how we might get out. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 61, 1–8.
Bartunek, J. M. (2019). Academics’ practice is consequential. Academy of Management Discoveries,
https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0254.
Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2010). The construction and contributions of ‘Implications for
Practice’: What’s in them and what might they
offer? Academy of Management Learning &
Education, 9, 100–117.
Battilana, J., Anteby, M., & Sengul, M. (2010). The
circulation of ideas across academic communities: When locals re-import exported ideas.
Organization Studies, 31, 695–713.
Baum, J. A. C. (2011). Free-riding on power laws:
Questioning the validity of the impact factor as
a measure of research quality in Organization
Studies. Organization, 18, 449–466.
Belkhir, M., Brouard, M., Brunk, K. H., Dalmoro,
M., Ferreira, M. C., Figueiredo, B., & Smith,
A. N. (2019). Isolation in globalizing academic
fields: A collaborative autoethnography of early
career researchers. Academy of Management
Learning & Education, 18, 261–285.
Bell, E., & de Gama, N. (2019). Taking a stand: The
embodied, enacted and emplaced work of relational critique. Organization, 26, 936–947.
Bell, E., Kothiyal, N., & Willmott, H. (2017).
Methodology-as-technique and the meaning
of rigour in globalized management research.
British Journal of Management, 28, 534–550.
Bell, E., & Sinclair, A. (2014). Reclaiming eroticism
in the academy. Organization, 21, 268–280.
Bell, E., & Willmott, H. (2019). Ethics, politics and
embodied imagination in crafting scientific
knowledge. Human Relations, https://journals
.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00187267198
76687#
Bergh, D. B., Sharp, B. M., Aguinis, H., & Li, M.
(2017). Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the
reproducibility of study findings. Strategic
Organization, 15, 423–436.
Berlant, L. (2004). Critical inquiry, affirmative culture. Critical Inquiry, 30, 445–451.
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
Biggart, N. W. (2016). Biggart’s lament, or getting
out of the theory cave. Journal of Management
Studies, 53, 1381–1387.
18 Organization Theory
Birkinshaw, J., Healey, M. P., Suddaby, R., & Weber,
K. (2014). Debating the future of management
research. Journal of Management Studies, 51,
38–55.
Bothello, J. & Roulet, T. J. (2019). The imposter
syndrome, or the mis-representation of self in
academic life. Journal of Management Studies,
56, 854–861.
Boxenbaum, E., & Rouleau, L. (2011). New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and
scripts in organizational theory. Academy of
Management Review, 36, 272–296.
Byington, E. K., & Felps, W. (2017). Solutions
to the credibility crisis in management science. Academy of Management Learning &
Education, 16, 142–162.
Cabantous, L., Gond, J.-P., Harding, N., & Learmonth,
M. (2016). Critical essay: Reconsidering critical
performativity. Human Relations, 69, 197–213.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology
of translation: Domestication of the scallops
and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law
(Ed.), Power, action and belief (pp. 196–223).
London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Canovan, M. (2018). Introduction. In H. Arendt, The
human condition (pp. i–xx). London: University
of Chicago Press.
Clegg, S. (2013). The space of academia: Privilege,
agency and the erasure of affect. In C. Maxwell
& P. Aggleton (Eds.), Privilege, agency
and affect (pp. 71–87). London: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Clegg, S. R., & Hardy, C. (1996). Organizations,
organization and organizing. In S. R. Clegg, C.
Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook
of organization studies (pp. 1–29). London:
SAGE Publications.
Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. (Eds.) (1996).
The Sage handbook of organization studies.
London: SAGE Publications.
Cornelissen, J. P. (2017). Preserving theoretical
divergence in management research: Why the
explanatory potential of qualitative research
should be harnessed rather than suppressed.
Journal of Management Studies, 54, 368–383.
Cornelissen, J. (2019). Imagining futures for
Organization Studies: The role of theory and of
having productive conversations towards theory
change. Organization Studies, 40, 55–58.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2009). Reflexivity, learning and
reflexive practice. In S. Armstrong & C. Fukami
(Eds.), Handbook of management learning,
education and development (pp. 405–441).
London: SAGE Publications.
Das, M., Borgos-Rodriguez, K., & Piper, A. M.
(2020). Weaving by touch: A case analysis of accessible making. Proceedings of the
2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in
Computing Systems, (pp. 1–15). https://doi.
org/10.1145/3313831.3376477
Davis, F. (1979). Yearning for yesterday: A sociology of nostalgia. New York: Free Press.
Davis, G. F. (2010). Do theories of organizations
progress? Organizational Research Methods,
13, 690–709.
Davis, G. F. (2015a). Editorial essay: What is organizational research for? Administrative Science
Quarterly, 60, 179–188.
Davis, G. F. (2015b). Celebrating organization theory: The after-party. Journal of Management
Studies, 52, 309–319.
Davis, G. F., Anteby, M., Briscoe, F. S., Jennings, P.
D., Karim, S., Kaul, A., . . . Zenter, T. R. (2019).
Politics, governance, and leadership: What can
we learn from the Academy of Management’s
response to EO13769? Journal of Management
Inquiry, 28, 283–290.
Dhaliwal, S., Nagarajan, C., & Varma, R. (2016).
Editorial. Feminist Dissent, (1), pp. i–v. http://
journals.warwick.ac.uk/index.php/feministdissent/article/view/8
Drichel, S. (2007). Of political bottom lines and last
ethical frontiers: the politics and ethics of ‘the
Other’. Borderlands, 6(2), AD1–AD1.
Eisenberg, R. S. (1987). Proprietary rights and the
norms of science in biotechnology research.
Yale Law Journal, 97, 177.
Empson, L. (2020). The emperor’s new clothes:
How our fear of seeming stupid became a selffulfilling prophecy. Academy of Management
Learning and Education, 19(2), 227–229.
Ergene, S., Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (2018).
Ecologies of sustainable concerns: Organization
theorizing for the Anthropocene. Gender, Work
and Organization, 25, 222–245.
Fabian, F. H. (2000). Keeping the tension: Pressures
to keep the controversy in the management discipline. Academy of Management Review, 25,
350–371.
Fisher, G., & Aguinis, H. (2017). Using theory
elaboration to make theoretical advancements.
Organizational Research Methods, 20, 438–464.
Fleming, P. (2019). Dark academia: Despair in
the neoliberal business school. Journal of
Cutcher et al. 19
Management Studies, https://doi.org/10.1111/
joms.12521.
Ford, J., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2010). Who
is it that would make business schools more
critical? Critical reflections on critical management studies. British Journal of Management,
21, S71–S81.
Fotaki, M., & Harding, N. (2012). Lacan and sexual difference in organization and management theory: Towards a hysterical academy?
Organization, 20, 153–172.
Fotaki, M., Metcalfe, B. D., & Harding, N. (2014).
Writing materiality into management and
Organization Studies through and with Luce
Irigaray. Human Relations, 67, 1239–1263.
Freeman, E. (2010). Time binds: Queer temporalities, queer histories. Durham, NC: Duke
University Press.
Gabriel, Y. (2010). Organization Studies: A space
for ideas, identities and agonies. Organization
Studies, 31, 757–775.
González-Morales, M. G. (2019). A more feminine scholarship: Relational practice for setting a good example. Academy of Management
Learning & Education, 18, 302–305.
Grey, C. (2010). Organizing studies: Publications,
politics and polemic. Organization Studies, 31,
677–694.
Grey, C. & Sinclair, A. (2006). Writing differently.
Organization, 13, 443–453.
Hamann, R., Luiz, J., Ramaboa, K., Khan, F.
Dhlamini, X., & Nilsson, W. (2020). Neither
colony nor enclave: Calling for dialogical contextualism in management and organization
studies. Organization Theory, 1, 1–21.
Harding, N., Ford, J., & Fotaki, M. (2012). Is
the ‘F’-word still dirty? A past, present and
future of/for feminist and gender studies in
Organization. Organization, 20, 51–65.
Harley, B. (2019). Confronting the crisis of confidence in management studies: Why senior scholars need to stop setting a bad example. Academy
of Management Learning & Education, 18,
286–297.
Harley, B., Faems, D., & Corbett, A. (2014).
A few bad apples or the tip of an iceberg?
Academic misconduct in publishing. Journal of
Management Studies, 51, 1361–1363.
Hartman, R. K. (2014). Subversive functionalism:
For a less canonical critique in critical management studies. Human Relations, 67, 611–632.
Hassard, J. (1993). Sociology and organization theory: Positivism, paradigms and postmodernity.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hibbert, P., Sillince, J., Diefenbach, T., & Cunliffe,
A. L. (2014). Relationally reflexive practice: A
generative approach to theory development in
qualitative research. Organizational Research
Methods, 17, 278–298.
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Starkey, K. (2011). Not simply returning to the same answer over and over
again: Reframing relevance. British Journal of
Management, 22, 355–369.
Hoffman, A. J. (2016). Reflections: Academia’s
emerging crisis of relevance and the consequent
role of the engaged scholar. Journal of Change
Management, 16, 77–96.
Holvino, E. (2010). Intersections: The simultaneity of
race, gender and class in Organization Studies.
Gender, Work and Organization, 17, 248–277.
Honig, B., & Bedi, A. (2012). The fox in the
hen house: A critical examination of plagiarism among members of the Academy
of Management. Academy of Management
Learning and Education, 11, 101–123.
Honig, B., Lampel, J., Baum, J. A. C., Glynn, M. A.,
Jing, R., Lounsbury, M., . . . van Witteloostuijn,
A. (2018). Reflections on scientific misconduct in management: Unfortunate incidents or
a normative crisis? Academy of Management
Perspectives, 32, 412–442.
Honig, B., Lampel, J., Siegel, D., & Drnevich, P.
(2014). Ethics in the production and dissemination of management research: Institutional
failure or individual fallibility? Journal of
Management Studies, 51, 118–142.
Hussain, S. (2015). Journal list fetishism and the
‘sign of 4’ in the ABS guide: A question of
trust? Organization, 22, 119–138.
Iedema, R. (2011). Discourse studies in the 21st
century: A response to Mats Alvesson and
Dan Kärreman’s ‘Decolonializing discourse’.
Human Relations, 64, 1163–1176.
Jack, G. A., Calás, M. B., Nkomo, S. M., & Peltonen,
T. (2008). Introduction to special topic forum:
Critique and international management: An
uneasy relationship? Academy of Management
Review, 33, 870–884.
Jack, G., Westwood, R., Srinivas, N., & Sardar, Z.
(2011). Deepening, broadening and re-asserting a
postcolonial interrogative space in Organization
Studies. Organization, 18, 275–302.
20 Organization Theory
Janssens, M., & Steyaert, C. (2009). Point–
counterpoint: HRM and performance: A plea
for reflexivity in HRM studies. Journal of
Management Studies, 46, 143–155.
Kenny, K., & Fotaki, M. (2015). From gendered
organizations to compassionate borderspaces:
Reading corporeal ethics with Bracha Ettinger.
Organization, 22, 183–199.
King, D., & Learmonth, M. (2015). Can critical
management studies ever be ‘practical’? A case
study in engaged scholarship. Human Relations,
68, 353–375.
Kiriakos, C., & Tienari, J. (2018). Academic writing
as love. Management Learning, 49, 263–277.
Kolrud, K., & Prusac, M. (2014). Iconoclasm from
antiquity to modernity. London: Routledge.
Kraimer, M. L., Greco, L., Seibert, S. E., & Sargent,
L. D. (2019). An investigation of academic
career success: The new tempo of academic
life. Academy of Management Learning &
Education, 18, 128–152.
Learmonth, M., Lockett, A., & Dowd, K. (2012).
Promoting scholarship that matters: The uselessness of useful research and the usefulness of useless research. British Journal of
Management, 23, 35–44.
Love, T. R. (2020). Indigenous knowledges, priorities
and processes in qualitative organization and management research: State of the field. Qualitative
Research in Organizations and Management: An
International Journal, 15(1), 6–20.
Lounsbury, M., & Wang, M. S. (2020). Into the
clearing: Back to the future of constitutive institutional analysis. Organization Theory, 1, 1–27.
Macdonald, S., & Kam, J. (2011). The skewed few:
People and papers of quality in management
studies. Organization, 18, 467–475.
Marinetto, M. (2018). Fast food research in the
era of unplanned obsolescence. Journal of
Management Studies, 55, 1014–1020.
Marshall, J. (2000). Revisiting Simone de Beauvoir:
Recognizing feminist contributions to pluralism in organizational studies. Journal of
Management Inquiry, 9, 166–172.
Mason, M. B. (2015). Towards positions of safe
uncertainty. InterAction, 7(1), 28–43.
McDonald, J. (2017). Queering methodologies
and organizational research: Disrupting, critiquing, and exploring. Qualitative Research
in Organizations and Management: An
International Journal, 12, 130–148.
McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women’s studies.
Wellesley MA: Wellesley College Center for
Research on Women.
Mehrpouya, A., & Willmott, H. (2018). Making
a niche: The marketization of management
research and the rise of ‘knowledge branding’.
Journal of Management Studies, 55, 728–734.
Meyer, R. E., & Boxenbaum, E. (2010). Exploring
European-ness in organization research.
Organization Studies, 31, 737–755.
Mingers, J., & Willmott, H. (2013). Taylorizing
business school research: On the ‘one best way’
performative effects of journal ranking lists.
Human Relations, 66, 1051–1073.
Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under western eyes: Feminist
scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary
2, On Humanism and the University I: The
Discourse of Humanism, 12/3–13/1, 333–358.
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2003). Tiddas talkin’ up to
the white woman: When Huggins et al. took
on Bell. In M. Grossman (Ed.), Blacklines:
Contemporary critical writing by indigenous
Australians. Melbourne: Melbourne University
Publishing.
Morgan, M. (2006). Economic man as model man:
Ideal types, idealization and caricatures. Journal
of the History of Economic Thought, 28, 1–27.
Moulin de Souza, E., Brewis, J., & Rumens, N.
(2016). Gender, the body and Organization
Studies: Que(e)rying empirical research.
Gender, Work & Organization, 23, 600–613.
Mumby, D. K. (2011). What’s cooking in organizational discourse studies? A response to Alvesson
and Kärreman. Human Relations, 64, 1147–1161.
Newton, T., Deetz, S., & Reed, M. (2011). Responses
to social constructionism and critical realism in
organization studies. Organization Studies, 32,
7–26.
Nord, W. R., Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Clegg, S.
R. (2006). Introduction. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy,
T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage
handbook of organization studies (second edition) (pp. 1–15). London: SAGE Publications.
Oswick, C., Fleming, P., & Hanlon, G. (2011).
From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the
processes of organizational theory building.
Academy of Management Review, 36, 318–337.
Oswick, C., Keenoy, T., & Grant, D. (2002). Metaphor
and analogical reasoning in organization theory:
Cutcher et al. 21
Beyond orthodoxy. Academy of Management
Review, 27, 294–303.
Page, T. (2017). Vulnerable writing as a feminist
methodological practice. Feminist Review, 115,
13–29.
Parker, M. (2015). The knobheadization of the university. Organization, 22, 741–750.
Parker, M., & Thomas, R. (2011). What is a critical
journal? Organization, 18, 419–427.
Phillips, M., Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. (2014). Writing
organization as gendered practice: Interrupting
the libidinal economy. Organization Studies,
35, 313–333.
Pirson, M. A., Adler, P. S., Barney, J. B., Bartunek,
J. M., Patient, D. L., Phillips, N., . . .Walsh, J.
P. (2019). From crisis to enlivenment: An AOM
president responds to EO13769. Journal of
Management Inquiry, 28, 291–297.
Povinelli, E. A. (2011). Economies of abandonment:
Social belonging and endurance in late liberalism. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
Prasad, A. (2016). Cyborg writing as a political
act: Reading Donna Haraway in Organization
Studies. Gender, Work & Organization, 23,
431–446.
Pullen, A. (2018). Writing as labiaplasty. Organization,
25, 123–130.
Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. (2015). Writing, the
feminine and organization. Gender, Work &
Organization, 22, 87–93.
Pullen, A., Thanem, T., Tyler, M., & Wallenberg,
L. (2016). Sexual politics, organizational practices: Interrogating queer theory, work and
organization. Gender, Work and Organization,
23, 1–6.
Reed, M., & Burrell, G. (2019). Theory and
Organization Studies: The need for contestation. Organization Studies, 40, 39–54.
Rhodes, C. (2019). Sense-ational organization
theory! Practices of democratic scriptology.
Management Learning, 50, 24–37.
Romme, A. G. L., Avenier, M-J., Denyer, D.,
Hodgkinson, G. P., Pandza, K., Starkey, K., &
Worren, N. (2015). Towards common ground
and trading zones in management research and
practice. British Journal of Management, 26,
544–559.
Rowlinson, M., & Hassard, J. (2011). How come the
critters came to be teaching in business schools?
Contradictions in the institutionalization of
critical management studies. Organization, 18,
673–689.
Rumens, N. (2016). Towards queering the business
school: A research agenda for advancing lesbian,
gay, bisexual and trans perspectives and issues.
Gender, Work and Organisation, 23, 36–51.
Schwarz, G. M. (2020). The enduring interest trap
in debating the state of a field. Academy of
Management Learning and Education, 19(2),
230–233.
Shaw, J. D., & Baer, M. (2020). ‘The sky is not falling’ and other reactions to Tourish’s wanderings. Academy of Management Learning and
Education, 19(2), 243–246.
Shepherd, D. A., & Suddaby, R. (2016). Theory
building: A review and integration. Journal of
Management, 43, 59–86.
Skeggs, B. (2002). Techniques for telling the reflexive
self. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action
(pp. 349–374). London: SAGE Publications.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a
theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium
model of organizing. Academy of Management
Review, 36, 381–403.
Sommerville, M. (1991). Life (hi)story writing: The
relationship between talk and text. Hecate,
17(1), 95–103.
Sparks, H. (1997). Dissident citizenship: Democratic
theory, political courage, and activist women.
Hypatia, 12, 74–110.
Spiller, C., Wolfgramm, R. M., Henry, E., &
Pouwhare, R. (2020). Paradigm warriors:
Advancing a radical ecosystems view of collective leadership from an Indigenous Māori perspective. Human Relations, 73, 516–543.
Stackman, R. W., de Holan, P. M., Argyres, N.,
Cabral, S., Moliterno, T. P., Stoner, J., & Walsh,
J. P. (2019). Dialogue as renounced aggression:
JMI and the case of AOM’s president’s response
to EO13769. Journal of Management Inquiry,
28, 268–275.
Steyaert, C. (2015) Three women. A kiss. A life.
On the queer writing of time in organization.
Gender, Work and Organization, 22, 163–178.
Steyaert, C., & Janssens, M. (2012). Multilingual
scholarship and the paradox of translation and
language in management and organization studies. Organization, 20, 131–142.
Suddaby, R. (2014). Why theory? Academy of
Management Review, 39, 407–411.
Suddaby, R., Hardy, C., & Quy, N. H. (2011).
Introduction to special topic forum: Where are
the new theories of organization? Academy of
Management Review, 36, 236–246.
22 Organization Theory
Svejenova, S. (2019). Constructive pluralism for a
theory of organization: Rediscovering our community, identity, and vocation. Organization
Studies, 40, 59–63.
Swan, E. (2017). What are white people to do?
Listening, challenging ignorance, generous
encounters and the ‘not yet’ as diversity research
praxis. Gender, Work and Organization, 24,
547–563.
Swedberg, R. (2018). How to use Max Weber’s
ideal type in sociological analysis. Journal of
Classical Sociology, 18, 181–196.
Thanem, T., & Knights, D. (2012). Feeling and
speaking through our gendered bodies:
Embodied self-reflection and research practice
in organisation studies. International Journal
of Work Organisation and Emotion, 5, 91–108.
The Editors (2015). Celebrating organization theory.
Journal of Management Studies, 52, 285–287.
Thompson, J. D. (1956). On building an administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly,
1, 102–111.
Tourish, D. (2020). The triumph of nonsense in
management studies. Academy of Management
Learning & Education, 19(1), 99–109.
Tourish, D., & Willmott, H. (2015). In defiance of
folly: Journal rankings, mindless measures
and the ABS Guide. Critical Perspectives on
Accounting, 26, 37–46.
Tsoukas, H. (2017). Don’t simplify, complexify:
From disjunctive to conjunctive theorizing in
organization and management studies. Journal
of Management Studies, 54, 132–153.
Vaara, E., & Durand, R. (2012). How to connect
strategy research with broader issues that matter? Strategic Organization, 10, 248–255.
Vachhani, S. J. (2015). Organizing love: Thoughts on
the transformative and activist potential of feminine writing. Gender, Work and Organization,
22, 148–162.
Weber, M. (1904). ‘Objectivity’ in social science and
social policy. In The methodology of the social
sciences, Shils, E.A. & Finch, H.A (Trans.,
Eds). New York: Free Press, 1949.
Westwood, R. I., & Jack, G. (2007). Manifesto for a
post-colonial international business and management studies: A provocation. Critical Perspectives
on International Business, 3, 246–265.
Wickert, C., & Schaefer, S. M. (2015). Towards a
progressive understanding of performativity in
critical management studies. Human Relations,
68, 107–130.
Willmott, H. (2011a). Journal list fetishism and the
perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the
ABS list. Organization, 18, 429–442.
Willmott, H. (2011b). Listing perilously.
Organization, 18, 447–448.
Willmott, H. (2011c). ‘Institutional work’ for what?
Problems and prospects of institutional theory.
Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 67–72.
Willmott, H. (2013). OT and power: The significance
of value-orientations and a plea for pluralism.
Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization
Inquiry, 11, 53–66.
Young, M. (1997). Asymmetrical reciprocity: On
moral respect, wonder and enlarged thought. In
M. Young (Ed.), Intersecting voices: Dilemmas
of gender, political philosophy, and policy (pp.
38–59). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Yoshikawa, T. (2019). Rejoinder to ‘Confronting
the crisis of confidence in management studies:
Why senior scholars need to stop setting a bad
example’ from the Asian perspective. Academy
of Management Learning & Education, 18,
References
References