Stephens, M. (2020) How housing systems are changing and why: a critique of Kemeny’s theory of housing regimes. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(5), pp. 521-547. (doi: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1814404)
Text
219566.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 2MB |
Abstract
This article critiques Kemeny’s theory of housing regimes to explain housing systems change. Power balances mediated through institutional structures are underlying causes of housing regimes in Kemeny’s schema in which the design of cost-rental sectors defines whole housing systems. However, the distinctive “unitary” systems Kemeny identified in Germany and Sweden are breaking down as economic failure prompted reforms to wider welfare systems, whilst mature cost-rental sectors were unable to maintain supply without subsidies. These mis-specifications in the theory have been exacerbated by the rise in unorthodox monetary policy. As poverty rates have risen, so the boundaries of possibility have shrunk, rendering “housing for all” approaches problematic and heralding more acute policy trade-offs. Nonetheless, policy choice and institutional differences counterbalance forces of convergence. Understanding system change requires theories of the middle range to be extended upwards to capture high-level forces of convergence and downwards to capture institutional detail that explains the difference.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This paper is linked to the paper available at http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/222667/ |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Stephens, Professor Mark |
Authors: | Stephens, M. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Urban Studies |
Journal Name: | Housing, Theory and Society |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis |
ISSN: | 1403-6096 |
ISSN (Online): | 1651-2278 |
Published Online: | 12 October 2020 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2020 The Author |
First Published: | First published in Housing, Theory and Society 37(5): 521-547 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced under a Creative Commons License |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record