Some consequences of ignoring relocations in the cost–benefit analysis of transportation infrastructure investments

McArthur, D. , Thorsen, I. and Ubøe, J. (2020) Some consequences of ignoring relocations in the cost–benefit analysis of transportation infrastructure investments. In: Thill, J.-C. (ed.) Innovations in Urban and Regional Systems. Springer: Cham, pp. 137-164. ISBN 9783030436926 (doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-43694-0_7)

[img] Text
215855.pdf - Accepted Version

1MB

Abstract

Traditional cost–benefit models of investments in road infrastructure are often based on demand curves assuming a given spatial distribution of jobs and households. We first use numerical experiments based on a spatial general equilibrium model to illustrate how this potentially introduces a serious prediction bias in the willingness-to-pay for the investments. Our experiments illustrate that it is not in general possible to say whether ignoring relocation effects leads to over- or underprediction of commuting flows. We identify cases of both kinds, and also cases where substantial changes in the road transportation network affect total commuting flows only marginally.

Item Type:Book Sections
Status:Published
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Mcarthur, Dr David
Authors: McArthur, D., Thorsen, I., and Ubøe, J.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Urban Studies
Publisher:Springer
ISBN:9783030436926
Copyright Holders:Copyright © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record