Murphy, M. (2022) Taking education to account? The limits of law in institutional and professional practice. Journal of Education Policy, 37(1), pp. 1-16. (doi: 10.1080/02680939.2020.1770337)
![]() |
Text
215835.pdf - Accepted Version 385kB |
Abstract
Recent years have seen the spread of a litigation culture in the UK education sector, with members of the public increasingly seeking recourse to the law to appeal, complain, or achieve compensation. The increasing tendency of people to resort to litigation suggests that recourse to the law is seen as a more immediate form of taking education services to account. While in theory an effective accountability tool, this development has unfortunately produced some less than desirable consequences in educational institutions, most notably the avoidance of risk. This paper argues that such consequences need to be understood as a reflection of the limits placed on legal regulation, once it encounters the already highly regulated world of educational institutions. To flesh out this argument, this paper examines these limits as a set of consequences relating to the following: increasing juridification; the intersection of law and mechanisms of accountability, judgement and professional discretion; and the relation between risk and trust. The argument draws on the ‘law in context’ literature, as well as recent debates over the pathologies of legal freedom.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Murphy, Dr Mark |
Authors: | Murphy, M. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Education College of Social Sciences > School of Education > Educational Leadership & Policy |
Journal Name: | Journal of Education Policy |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
ISSN: | 0268-0939 |
ISSN (Online): | 1464-5106 |
Published Online: | 18 May 2020 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2020 Informa UK, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
First Published: | First published in Journal of Education Policy 37(1): 1-16 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record