Kreft, J.-U., Griffin, B. M. and González-Cabaleiro, R. (2020) Evolutionary causes and consequences of metabolic division of labour: why anaerobes do and aerobes don’t. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 62, pp. 80-87. (doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.08.008) (PMID:31654858)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
Metabolic division of the labour of organic matter decomposition into several steps carried out by different types of microbes is typical for many anoxic — but not oxic environments. An explanation of this well-known pattern is proposed based on the combination of three key insights: (i) well-studied anoxic environments are high flux environments: they are only anoxic because their high organic matter influx leads to oxygen depletion; (ii) shorter, incomplete catabolic pathways provide the capacity for higher flux, but this capacity is only advantageous in high flux environments; (iii) longer, complete catabolic pathways have energetic happy ends but only with high redox potential electron acceptors. Thus, aerobic environments favour longer pathways. Bioreactors, in contrast, are high flux environments and therefore favour division of catabolic labour even if aeration keeps them aerobic; therefore, host strains and feeding strategies must be carefully engineered to resist this pull.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Gonzalez-Cabaleiro, Dr Rebeca |
| Authors: | Kreft, J.-U., Griffin, B. M., and González-Cabaleiro, R. |
| College/School: | College of Science and Engineering > School of Engineering > Infrastructure and Environment |
| Journal Name: | Current Opinion in Biotechnology |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| ISSN: | 0958-1669 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1879-0429 |
| Published Online: | 22 October 2019 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Altmetric
Altmetric