Good to be bad: should we be worried by the sharing economy?

Chalmers, D. and Matthews, R. (2019) Good to be bad: should we be worried by the sharing economy? Strategic Change, 28(6), pp. 403-408. (doi: 10.1002/jsc.2295)

204026.pdf - Accepted Version



We develop the notion of a legitimacy tipping point to demonstrate how informal economy practices are being utilized by innovative sharing economy ventures to gain a competitive advantage that is subsequently leveraged to reconfigure formal institutional arrangements. Companies who are able to scale rapidly can afford to contravene regulations, provided they have public support. When they reach a certain size, in terms of investment and customer numbers, regulators are forced into a reactive position where novel business models are legitimized. This raises an important question for regulators and entrepreneurs as to whether subverting business regulation is being viewed as a viable source of competitive advantage by scaling firms.

Item Type:Articles
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Chalmers, Professor Dominic
Authors: Chalmers, D., and Matthews, R.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Management
Journal Name:Strategic Change
ISSN (Online):1099-1697
Published Online:19 November 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2019 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
First Published:First published in Strategic Change 28(6): 403-408
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record