Molecular tools for bathing water assessment in Europe: Balancing social science research with a rapidly developing environmental science evidence-base

Oliver, D. M. et al. (2016) Molecular tools for bathing water assessment in Europe: Balancing social science research with a rapidly developing environmental science evidence-base. AMBIO, 45(1), pp. 52-62. (doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0698-9) (PMID:26392185) (PMCID:PMC4709354)

[img]
Preview
Text
203161.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

533kB

Abstract

The use of molecular tools, principally qPCR, versus traditional culture-based methods for quantifying microbial parameters (e.g., Fecal Indicator Organisms) in bathing waters generates considerable ongoing debate at the science–policy interface. Advances in science have allowed the development and application of molecular biological methods for rapid (~2 h) quantification of microbial pollution in bathing and recreational waters. In contrast, culture-based methods can take between 18 and 96 h for sample processing. Thus, molecular tools offer an opportunity to provide a more meaningful statement of microbial risk to water-users by providing near-real-time information enabling potentially more informed decision-making with regard to water-based activities. However, complementary studies concerning the potential costs and benefits of adopting rapid methods as a regulatory tool are in short supply. We report on findings from an international Working Group that examined the breadth of social impacts, challenges, and research opportunities associated with the application of molecular tools to bathing water regulations.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:The Working Group and associated workshop series were funded by the Natural Environment Research Council as part of the Delivering Healthy Water project (NE/I022191/1). LF received funding in part by the European Regional Development Fund Programme and the European Social Fund Convergence Programme for Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Hanley, Professor Nicholas
Authors: Oliver, D. M., Hanley, N. D., van Niekerk, M., Kay, D., Heathwaite, A. L., Rabinovici, S. J.M., Kinzelman, J. L., Fleming, L. E., Porter, J., Shaikh, S., Fish, R., Chilton, S., Hewitt, J., Connolly, E., Cummins, A., Glenk, K., McPhail, C., McRory, E., McVittie, A., Giles, A., Roberts, S., Simpson, K., Tinch, D., Thairs, T., Avery, L. M., Vinten, A. J.A., Watts, B. D., and Quilliam, R. S.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine
Journal Name:AMBIO
Publisher:Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
ISSN:0044-7447
ISSN (Online):1654-7209
Published Online:21 September 2015
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2015 The Authors
First Published:First published in AMBIO 45(1):52-62
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record