Short versus extended progesterone supplementation for luteal phase support in fresh IVF cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Watters, M., Noble, M., Child, T. and Nelson, S. (2020) Short versus extended progesterone supplementation for luteal phase support in fresh IVF cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 40(1), pp. 143-150. (doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.10.009) (PMID:31864902)

[img] Text
201780.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

635kB

Abstract

This review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effect of prolonged progesterone support on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Two independent authors searched Embase, MEDLINE and grey literature from inception to January 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of prolonged progesterone support versus early cessation. Risk of bias was assessed. Outcome measures were live birth, miscarriage and ongoing pregnancy rate. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018088605). Seven trials involving 1627 participants were included: three reported live birth rate (672/830), seven the miscarriage rate (178/1627) and seven the ongoing pregnancy rate (1351/1627). Clinical outcomes were similar between early progesterone cessation versus progesterone continuation: live birth rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–1.00), miscarriage rate (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69–1.20) and ongoing pregnancy rate (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91–1.05). Ongoing pregnancy rates were similar when analyses were restricted to those with cessation of progesterone on the day of a positive human chorionic gonadotrophin (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83–1.06). This meta-analysis suggests that prolonged progesterone support may be unnecessary after fresh embryo transfer. Further larger RCT would be useful to corroborate and lead to standardized duration of progesterone luteal phase support across IVF/ICSI centres.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Nelson, Professor Scott and Watters, Dr Marianne
Authors: Watters, M., Noble, M., Child, T., and Nelson, S.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
Journal Name:Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1472-6483
ISSN (Online):1472-6491
Published Online:24 October 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © © 2019 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd.
First Published:First published in Reproductive BioMedicine Online 40(1):143-150
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record