Dingwall, J. and Haeri, H. (2010) ATA Construction Industrial and Trading Co v Jordan: ICSID Tribunal finds Jordan in violation of its investment treaty obligations (Case Comment). International Arbitration Law Review, 13(4), N33-N35.
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
Highlights the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Tribunal decision in ATA Construction Industrial and Trading Co v Jordan on whether the actions of Jordan's courts in annulling the compensation awarded against a Jordanian state-owned company in an arbitration dispute brought by a Turkish company contracted to build a dyke in Jordan constituted a violation of Jordan's obligations under the Jordan-Turkey Bilateral Investment Treaty and a breach of the Turkish company's legal rights under the original contract, entitling it to restitution of the award.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Dingwall, Dr Joanna |
Authors: | Dingwall, J., and Haeri, H. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Law |
Journal Name: | International Arbitration Law Review |
Publisher: | Sweet and Maxwell |
ISSN: | 1367-8272 |
ISSN (Online): | 1367-8272 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record