Responsibility for another's wrong in Scotland: stick with Lister or twist with Mohamud?

Bogle, S. (2019) Responsibility for another's wrong in Scotland: stick with Lister or twist with Mohamud? Juridical Review, 2019(3), pp. 211-230.

[img]
Preview
Text
189515.pdf - Accepted Version

267kB

Abstract

Traces the interpretation and application of the law of vicarious liability in Scotland from the ruling in Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd (SC) to the ruling in Vaickuviene v J Sainsbury Plc (IH). Considers whether the Scottish courts should follow the approach laid down by the Inner House or follow Mohamud v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc (SC) when determining whether an act falls within the course of employment.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Bogle, Dr Stephen
Authors: Bogle, S.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal Name:Juridical Review
Publisher:W. Green
ISSN:0022-6785
ISSN (Online):0022-6785
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2019 Sweet and Maxwell
First Published:First published in Juridical Review 2019(3):211-230
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record