Mediastinal node staging by positron emission tomography-computed tomography and selective endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration for patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer: results from a regional centre

Harrington, C., Smith, L., Bisland, J., López González, E., Jamieson, N., Paterson, S. and Stanley, A. J. (2018) Mediastinal node staging by positron emission tomography-computed tomography and selective endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration for patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer: results from a regional centre. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 10(1), pp. 37-44. (doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i1.37) (PMID:29375740) (PMCID:PMC5769002)

[img]
Preview
Text
187149.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

1MB

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in the nodal staging of upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in a tertiary referral centre. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively recorded data held on all patients with a diagnosis of upper GI cancer made between January 2009 and December 2015. Only those patients who had both a PET-CT and EUS with FNA sampling of a mediastinal node distant from the primary tumour were included. Using a positive EUS-FNA result as the gold standard for lymph node involvement, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and accuracy of PET-CT in the staging of mediastinal lymph nodes were calculated. The impact on therapeutic strategy of adding EUS-FNA to PET-CT was assessed. Results: One hundred and twenty one patients were included. Sixty nine patients had a diagnosis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (Thirty one of whom were junctional), forty eight had oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and four had gastric adenocarcinoma. The FNA results were inadequate in eleven cases and the PET-CT findings were indeterminate in two cases, therefore thirteen patients (10.7%) were excluded from further analysis. There was concordance between PET-CT and EUS-FNA findings in seventy one of the remaining one hundred and eight patients (65.7%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values of PET-CT were 92.5%, 50%, 52.1% and 91.9% respectively. There was discordance between PET-CT and EUS-FNA findings in thirty seven out of one hundred and eight patients (34.3%). MDT discussion led to a radical treatment pathway in twenty seven of these cases, after the final tumour stage was altered as a direct consequence of the EUS-FNA findings. Of these patients, fourteen (51.9%) experienced clinical remission of a median of nine months (range three to forty two months). Conclusion: EUS-FNA leads to altered staging of upper GI cancer, resulting in more patients receiving radical treatment that would have been the case using PET-CT staging alone.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Stanley, Dr Adrian
Authors: Harrington, C., Smith, L., Bisland, J., López González, E., Jamieson, N., Paterson, S., and Stanley, A. J.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
Journal Name:World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher:Baishideng Publishing Group
ISSN:1948-5190
ISSN (Online):1948-5190
Published Online:20 November 2017
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2018 The Authors
First Published:First published in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 10(1): 37-44
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record