The role of mundane and subtle institutional work in market dynamics: a case of fashion clothing market

Ghaffari, M., Jafari, A. and Sandikci, O. (2019) The role of mundane and subtle institutional work in market dynamics: a case of fashion clothing market. Journal of Business Research, 105, pp. 434-442. (doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.029)

[img] Text
184383.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

461kB

Abstract

Research on market dynamics shows that markets (trans)form through the institutional work of a wide range of actors. This literature, however, focuses on resourceful and/or powerful actors who can freely and openly shape the market. Via an inductive analysis of the Iranian female fashion clothing market, we examine the institutional work undertaken by actors who have limited resources and are subject to power structures that constrain their institutional work. We find that consumers, designers, retailers, and social activists engage in ambidextrous practices, secure networks, and stealthy defiance to navigate or moderate their institutional restrictions. Such work contributes to the relaxation of some state regulations and the coexistence of parallel taste structures. The study draws attention to mundane, subtle, and less visible and organized institutional work and extends knowledge on marketplace resistance by showing that everyday acts of resistance can function as unintentional institutional work that contributes to market dynamics.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Sandikci Turkdogan, Professor Ozlem
Authors: Ghaffari, M., Jafari, A., and Sandikci, O.
Subjects:H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Management
Journal Name:Journal of Business Research
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0148-2963
ISSN (Online):1873-7978
Published Online:26 March 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc.
First Published:First published in Journal of Business Research 105: 434-442
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record