The right to justification and proportionality: A plea for determinacy and stability

Zysset, A. (2020) The right to justification and proportionality: A plea for determinacy and stability. In: Langvatn, S., Kumm, M. and Sadurski, W. (eds.) Public Reason and Courts. Series: Studies on international courts and tribunals. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 256-280. ISBN 9781108487351 (doi: 10.1017/9781108766579.011)

[img] Text
183628.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only



The right to justification (RTJ) is borrowed from moral and political theory to offer normative guidance in the concrete and localized circumstances of the proportionality test. Based on the seminal work of Rainer Forst, Mattias Kumm has illustrated in various pieces how the RTJ operates in the proportionality context by identifying “excluded reasons” for limiting rights. However, Kumm does not clearly explain if the test also helps identify what the RTJ positively requires. This chapter aims to remedy this deficit in three steps: (1) present the core features of Forst’s account of the RTJ and emphasize the right that best demarcates the RTJ from rival accounts of human rights, namely the right to democratic participation; (2) reconstruct the precise role that the RTJ should play in proportionality analysis as suggested by Kumm, which the author insists on the common thread between Forst and Kumm, namely how the principle of mutual justifiability should inform the evaluative part of the proportionality test; and (3) show how the RTJ can help to balance two equally protected rights, expression and privacy, by reference to the practice of the European Court of Human Rights.

Item Type:Book Sections
Additional Information:Ebook isbn 9781108766579
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Zysset, Dr Alain
Authors: Zysset, A.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Publisher:Cambridge University Press

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record