Kemp, G. (2018) On looking through Wollheim’s bifocals: depiction, twofolded seeing and the trompe-l’œil. British Journal of Aesthetics, 58(4), pp. 435-447. (doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayy031)
![]() |
Text
170396.pdf - Accepted Version 709kB |
Abstract
Richard Wollheim was hardly alone in supposing that his account of pictorial depiction implies that a trompe-l’œil is not a depiction. I recommend removing this apparent implication by inserting a Kant-style version of aspect-perception into his account. I characterize the result as Neo-Wollheimian and retain the centrality of Wollheim’s notion of twofoldedness in the theory of depiction, but I demote it to a contingent feature of depictions and I criticize his employment of it for determining the category of both the trompe-l’œil and depictions in general.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Kemp, Dr Gary |
Authors: | Kemp, G. |
College/School: | College of Arts > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Journal Name: | British Journal of Aesthetics |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
ISSN: | 0007-0904 |
ISSN (Online): | 1468-2842 |
Published Online: | 01 October 2018 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2018 British Journal of Aesthetics |
First Published: | First published in British Journal of Aesthetics 58(4): 435-447 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record