Do patients' faces influence General Practitioners' cancer suspicions? A test of automatic processing of sociodemographic information

Adam, R., Garau, R., Raja, E. A., Jones, B. , Johnston, M. and Murchie, P. (2017) Do patients' faces influence General Practitioners' cancer suspicions? A test of automatic processing of sociodemographic information. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0188222. (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188222) (PMID:29166652) (PMCID:PMC5699847)

Abstract

Background: Delayed cancer diagnosis leads to poorer patient outcomes. During short consultations, General Practitioners (GPs) make quick decisions about likelihood of cancer. Patients’ facial cues are processed rapidly and may influence diagnosis. Aim: To investigate whether patients’ facial characteristics influence immediate perception of cancer risk by GPs. Design and setting: Web-based binary forced choice experiment with GPs from Northeast Scotland. Method: GPs were presented with a series of pairs of face prototypes and asked to quickly select the patient more likely to have cancer. Faces were modified with respect to age, gender, and ethnicity. Choices were analysed using Chi-squared goodness-of-fit statistics with Bonferroni corrections. Results: Eighty-two GPs participated. GPs were significantly more likely to suspect cancer in older patients. Gender influenced GP cancer suspicion, but this was modified by age: the male face was chosen as more likely to have cancer than the female face for young (72% of GPs;95% CI 61.0–87.0) and middle-aged faces (65.9%; 95% CI 54.7–75.5); but 63.4% (95% CI 52.2–73.3) decided the older female was more likely to have cancer than the older male (p = 0.015). GPs were significantly more likely to suspect cancer in the young Caucasian male (65.9% (95% CI 54.7, 75.5)) compared to the young Asian male (p = 0.004). Conclusion: GPs’ first impressions about cancer risk are influenced by patient age, gender, and ethnicity. Tackling GP cognitive biases could be a promising way of reducing cancer diagnostic delays, particularly for younger patients.

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Jones, Professor Benedict
• Authors: Adam, R., Garau, R., Raja, E. A., Jones, B., Johnston, M., and Murchie, P.
• College/School: College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Psychology & Neuroscience
• Journal Name: PLoS ONE
• Publisher: Public Library of Science
• ISSN: 1932-6203
• ISSN (Online): 1932-6203
• Copyright Holders: Copyright © 2017 Adam et al.
• First Published: First published in PLoS ONE 12(11): e0188222
• Publisher Policy: Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy