Schreven, S. (2018) Conspiracy theorists and organization studies. Organization Studies, 39(10), pp. 1473-1488. (doi: 10.1177/0170840617727783)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
This essay proposes an experiment in workplace emancipation by letting go of the assumption of who knows best in the domain of knowledge and suspending ‘social closure’ (Weber) as a mechanism of exclusion. Specifically, I experiment with a stance I adopt from Jacques Rancière, which is to presuppose equality, in this case with conspiracy theorists, starting by listening to what they have to say, rather than seeking to silence them and dismissing them a priori. Listening to what conspiracy theorists have to say, I propose a reconfiguration and recalibration of our empirical awareness derived from their practices and their aesthetics. In particular, I seek to reclaim close attention to detail, regarded by Hofstadter as a core feature of the paranoid style, for a democratic style. The implication of my experiment is an invitation to rethink knowledge building in the form of cases, resulting by engaging intimately with the unaccounted for as part of a conversation among equals that encourages independent thinking.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Management of technology and innovation, strategy and management, organizational behavior and human resource management. |
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Schreven, Dr Stephanie |
| Authors: | Schreven, S. |
| College/School: | College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Management |
| Journal Name: | Organization Studies |
| Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
| ISSN: | 0170-8406 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1741-3044 |
| Published Online: | 23 September 2017 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Altmetric
Altmetric