An empirical assessment of optimal monetary policy in the Euro area

Chen, X., Kirsanova, T. and Leith, C. (2017) An empirical assessment of optimal monetary policy in the Euro area. European Economic Review, 100, pp. 95-115. (doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.07.012)

[img]
Preview
Text
145748.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

706kB

Abstract

We estimate a New Keynesian DSGE model for the Euro area under alternative descriptions of monetary policy (discretion, commitment or a simple rule) after allowing for Markov switching in policy-maker preferences and shock volatilities. This reveals that there have been several changes in Euro-area policy making, with a strengthening of the anti-inflation stance in the early years of the ERM, which was then lost around the time of German reunification and only recovered following the turmoil in the ERM in 1992. The ECB does not appear to have been any more conservative as aggregate Euro-area policy was under Bundesbank leadership. The estimates also suggest that the most appropriate description of policy is that of discretion, with no evidence of commitment in the Euro-area. As a result, although both ‘good luck’ and ‘good policy’ played a role in the moderation of inflation and output volatility in the Euro-area, the welfare gains would have been substantially higher had policy makers been able to commit. Adopting a flexible price level target would lead to outcomes close to commitment.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Kirsanova, Professor Tatiana and Leith, Professor Campbell and Chen, Dr Xiaoshan
Authors: Chen, X., Kirsanova, T., and Leith, C.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Economics
Journal Name:European Economic Review
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0014-2921
ISSN (Online):1873-572X
Published Online:14 August 2017
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
First Published:First published in European Economic Review 100:95-115
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record