Cowan, R. (2017) Rossian conceptual intuitionism. Ethics, 127(4), pp. 821-851. (doi: 10.1086/691566)
|
Text
135509.pdf - Accepted Version 457kB |
Abstract
In this article I assess Rossian Intuitionism, which is the view that the Rossian Principles of Duty are self-evident. I begin by motivating and clarifying a version of the view—Rossian Conceptual Intuitionism—that hasn’t been adequately considered by Rossians. After defending it against a series of significant objections, I show that enthusiasm for Rossian Conceptual Intuitionism should be muted. Specifically, I argue that we lack sufficient reason for thinking that the Rossian Principles are self-evident, and that insisting that they are self-evident (perhaps in an attenuated sense) may commit Rossians to radically expanding the scope of self-evidence.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Cowan, Dr Robert |
Authors: | Cowan, R. |
College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Journal Name: | Ethics |
Publisher: | University of Chicago Press |
ISSN: | 0014-1704 |
ISSN (Online): | 1539-297X |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2017 The University of Chicago |
First Published: | First published in Ethics 127(4):821-851 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record